Fatshimetrie is a publication that focuses on current topics of international importance. Recently, a major event shook the region with the Israeli occupation of the summit of Mount Hermon in Syria. This strategic action has sparked many reactions and raised questions about its short- and long-term implications.
Located in the buffer zone between Israel and Syria, Mount Hermon is a highly strategic point, offering a breathtaking view of Lebanon, Syria and Israel. With an altitude of 2,814 meters, it surpasses all other peaks in the region. This dominant position gives Israel an undeniable advantage in terms of electronic surveillance and advanced defense capability.
The Israeli occupation of Mount Hermon has been justified by security reasons. Indeed, Israel fears that weapons or military equipment will fall into the hands of terrorist groups operating in Syria. In a world where security is a priority, control of this key position is seen as essential to protect Israel’s national interests.
However, this occupation raises questions about the respect for international law and the political implications of such actions. Israel’s annexation of the Golan Heights in 1981 is considered illegal by the international community, and the continued occupation of Mount Hermon is sure to attract further criticism.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has stressed that the occupation of Mount Hermon is temporary, but the circumstances that could lead to a withdrawal of Israeli forces remain unclear. Israeli authorities are cautious in the face of the volatile situation in Syria, where the terrorist threat and internal conflicts remain a daily reality.
Despite assurances of future cooperation with a stable Syrian government that respects ceasefire agreements, the question of the duration of the Israeli occupation of Mount Hermon remains unresolved. The security and political issues surrounding this region remain complex and uncertain.
In conclusion, Israel’s occupation of Mount Hermon represents a major turning point in the regional context. This action raises questions about security, legality, and international relations. The future of the region will depend in part on how the stakeholders manage this delicate situation and the decisions that result from it.