Article – The state of siege in the DRC: a contested extension
The security situation in the provinces of North Kivu and Ituri in the Democratic Republic of Congo is the subject of particular attention. A state of siege was established in these regions to deal with the increase in insecurity, and its extension was at the heart of the debates during a recent plenary at the National Assembly.
President Félix Tshisekedi justified this decision by highlighting the progress recorded during the period of state of siege, in particular the improvement in the security situation in certain areas of the two provinces. However, this extension sparked contrasting reactions.
On the one hand, some believe that the extension of the state of siege is necessary to maintain stability and security in the region. They highlight the progress made so far and affirm that the situation remains fragile, thus justifying the extension of this exceptional measure.
On the other hand, other voices are being raised to criticize this decision. These critics believe that it is time to end the state of siege and favor lasting solutions to resolve security problems in these provinces. They emphasize the need to strengthen civil institutions and find political solutions to resolve local conflicts.
Beyond this extension, it is also important to highlight the issues linked to the situation in these regions. Civilian populations are the first victims of insecurity, and it is essential to guarantee their security and offer them dignified living conditions.
Furthermore, the question of the participation of political actors and the holding of elections is also crucial. President Tshisekedi stressed the importance of guaranteeing the full and complete participation of all actors involved in the electoral process, without hindrance. It is therefore essential to ensure that the conditions for a transparent and democratic election are met.
In conclusion, the extension of the state of siege in North Kivu and Ituri continues to give rise to debates in the Democratic Republic of Congo. This decision highlights the different visions regarding security management in these regions. It is essential to balance the need to maintain order and stability with the search for lasting political solutions to resolve local conflicts. The protection of civilian populations and the preservation of the integrity of the electoral process remain major priorities to guarantee a peaceful and prosperous future for the Congolese population.