### Kinshasa: call to support the American-Congolese agreement and its socio-political scope
On June 1, 2025, a colorful political meeting was held in Kinshasa, organized by the Common Action Party for the Republic (ACR). This event, marked by the call to support an agreement in gestation between the United States and the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), highlights several crucial issues that go beyond simple political affiliation, engaging questions of sovereignty, international commitment and management of internal crises.
#### A context of tensions
The DRC faces a very complex context, steeped in armed conflicts, ethnic tensions and humanitarian crises. The president of ACR, Eliezer Ntambwe, underlined the dangers represented by the “former dignitaries” and accused those who oppose the American agreement of collaborating with what he describes as “Rwandan enemy”. By closing the debate on the tumultuous history of relations between the DRC and Rwanda, this declaration tries to galvanize popular support around a clear narrative: the need for national unity in the face of threats perceived as external.
However, accusations of opportunism and betrayal suffer from a certain generalization which requires being examined closely. Such an polarization can actually exacerbate internal tensions, instead of promoting a constructive dialogue around the solutions to be provided.
#### The question of Kingakati’s occupation
Another point raised during this meeting is the proposal for the “occupation” of the Kingakati farm, owned by former President Joseph Kabila, in order to house the sinists of the floods, but also the displaced war. This proposal raises ethical and practical questions. On the one hand, it seems to reflect a desire to act in the face of humanitarian distress, a point which deserves to be greeted. On the other, the concrete application of such an action seems complex, both legal and logistically. How to guarantee the dignity of the persons concerned while respecting private property and the rights of former dignitaries?
The reference to the construction of Kingakati “on equity of the Congolese” also seems to play on nationalist feelings. This raises the question of the way in which state resources are perceived and used: which should benefit from the fruits of these resources in times of crisis?
#### Support of customary chefs
The presence and support of customary chiefs during this meeting testify to a strong cultural anchoring. Michel Mbaya, representative of customary chiefs, reaffirmed his support for Ntambwe, while firmly condemning violence. Customary chiefs play an essential role in mediation of conflicts and can be important vectors of peace. Their commitment to a cessation of hostilities can be a precious asset in the search for a lasting solution to recurring violence in the east of the country.
Their voice, which often resonates within communities, could also contribute to changing perceptions on agreements that are put in place with international actors, such as the United States, while shaping a discourse that calls for unity rather than division.
#### Reflections on the future
The agreement between the DRC and the United States, although potentially beneficial on an economic and strategic level, must be approached with caution. What place for national sovereignty within the framework of such agreements? How can we guarantee that the interests of the Congolese people be really taken into account without relying solely on the dynamics of power in place?
The release of recurring tensions, both internal and external, requires a holistic approach, which incorporates dialogues at all levels – as well political as with civil society. This could go through initiatives promoting peaceful cohabitation, as well as the implementation of public policies which really meet the needs of the populations affected by crises.
#### Conclusion
It is imperative that the Congolese people take part in discussions on their future, without squatting the story under simplistic directors. Civic engagement and listening to the various voices, including those of the disappeared from the eastern country, must guide reflection on the American-Congolese agreement. By cultivating a space for dialogue, the DRC could really envisage a more radiant future, not as a distant dream, but as an accessible reality, based on solidarity, equality and dignity.