** Visit of the European delegation in the DRC: a sign of commitment or an alert signal? **
The recent visit to a delegation of European parliamentarians in Kinshasa, which ended on May 30, highlights both the affirmed support of the European Union to the Congolese people and the urgency of approaching the security crisis that affects the country, especially in the East, where the AFC/M23 armed group reigns terror. This mission, although initially conceived as a gesture of solidarity, turned out to be a crucial opportunity to assess the situation on the ground and to formulate responses adapted to a complex crisis.
The delegation’s head of the delegation, Hilde Fremans, stressed during a press conference the importance of cooperation and solidarity between the various Congolese actors. By meeting with President Tshisekedi, parliamentarians, religious representatives, as well as members of the opposition, European deputies combined their message of support for a call to unity. The need to work together for peace seems to be an inevitable necessity in the face of the challenges faced by the DRC.
### An alarming humanitarian situation
One of the protruding points of this visit is the recognition by the delegation of the disastrous humanitarian impact caused by the conflict. According to estimates, millions of Congolese suffer from food insecurity, forced trips, and limited access to health care. The demand for a humanitarian corridor and an air bridge to Goma is a priority that calls for a coordinated international response. These kinds of measures, although crucial, also raises the question of the sustainability of the solutions put in place. Are recent needs a mirror of past crises, or do they reflect long-term systemic failures in terms of governance and development?
### The role of Rwanda and regional dynamics
Another fundamental aspect mentioned by European parliamentarians concerns the involvement of Rwanda in the Congolese conflict. The accusations of support for armed groups such as the M23 open a delicate debate on the responsibility of neighboring states in the destabilization of the DRC. The call for the suspension of certain European Union agreements with Rwanda raises questions about the effectiveness of diplomacy and sanctions in such complex contexts. How to ensure constructive pressure on Rwanda without harming the civilian populations that could be taken hostage by political decisions?
### Outlook for the future
The parliamentarians also expressed the wish to go to the eastern country to better understand the extent of the crisis. This approach seems to be an essential step to understand the deep causes of the conflict. The need to strengthen presence on the ground would not only make European decision -makers aware of Congolese realities, but also to contribute to the development of concrete recommendations.
The promise of a new resolution to the European Parliament shows a desire for short -term action. However, it remains to be defined how this approach will be implemented and how it will result in tangible actions. The tangible results of such efforts often depend on a long -term commitment, not only between the Congolese and European stakeholders, but also with other regional actors.
### Conclusion
In the end, the visit to the European delegation in Kinshasa represents an opportunity to explore solutions for a crisis that has been going on for too long. The key lies in cooperation, listening to the real needs of the affected populations, and the formulation of balanced and respectful responses. While international attention turns to the DRC, it becomes essential to keep in mind that each action must aim to establish a dialogue, to create bridges rather than to erect barriers. Consequently, the next stages in this process should not only focus on the immediate resolution of the crisis, but also on the construction of a sustainable future for the Democratic Republic of Congo.