### The request for the lifting of Joseph Kabila’s immunities: a sensitive political issue
On May 15, 2025, the Congolese Senate will look at the request for the lifting of parliamentary immunity from former President Joseph Kabila, under the serious accusations of collusion with the rebellion of the M23. This decision will be able to open the way to legal proceedings against a man who has led the country for almost 18 years. This moment, crucial for the political life of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), deserves an in -depth reflection on both legal and socio -political implications.
### Context and issues
Joseph Kabila, at the head of the state from 2001 to 2019, was both a central figure in the Congolese political landscape and a controversial character, often criticized for his style of governance. The current accusations, which bind him to the rebellion of the M23, highlight the persistent tensions between the political actors in the DRC. This movement, which emerged in the 2010s, is often perceived as a symbol of internal struggles and armed conflicts that have afflicted the country.
The request for the lifting of immunities is part of a tense political context, where the allegations of an instrumentalization of justice for political ends are regularly mentioned. Critics, especially coming from the ranks of the opposition and civil society, underline the risks of an abusive use of this approach, pointing to the need to preserve national cohesion in the face of an already polarized climate.
### Divergent voices
The diversity of opinions on this question is represented by the stakeholders chosen to discuss it. Mandhack Mandefu, professor of law and politician, could defend the idea that justice must take its course without political interference. On the other hand, Emery Okundji, a former minister and a member of the opposition, could express reservations about the motivations behind this request, arguing that it could be perceived as a witch hunt. As for Ghislain-Prince Kalume Beybey, an expert in international law, he could bring a perspective on the legal issues and the human rights that this request raises.
These voices, although different, present each essential considerations which deserve to be examined in the light of the rule of law and fair justice. How can real motivations behind this request be discerned? And what would the consequences for Congolese institutions be?
### The potential consequences
Examination of the demand for lifting immunities could have deep repercussions. In the event of acceptance, this could open a precedent as to the responsibility of the former leaders, while aroused the fear of a politicization of the judicial institutions. Such an evolution could cause a crisis of confidence in the judicial system, especially since historical precedents show that political proceedings can exacerbate tensions within society.
Conversely, a refusal to lift immunities could give the impression of impunity for former leaders, also fueling feelings of frustration in a population that aspires to justice and truth. It is therefore crucial that the process takes place with transparency and respecting the principles of legality.
### Towards an opening to dialogue
In this complex context, it is imperative to initiate a constructive dialogue between the various political actors and civil society. The search for a solution that preserves social peace while ensuring impartial justice is a major challenge, but essential for the future of the country. Organizing discussion forums, where everyone’s concerns can be expressed without fear of repercussions, could promote a climate of trust.
The path to be covered remains strewn with pitfalls, but it also embodies an opportunity to advance towards a society where the responses to past crises are possible in a framework of justice and equity, rather than by exacerbated political rivalries.
### Conclusion
The debate on the lifting of the parliamentary immunities of Joseph Kabila is not just a matter of legality. It raises profound issues of governance, justice and national reconciliation. In a country still marked by the trauma of the past, the way in which this situation will be managed can determine the future trajectory of democracy and peace in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Only a thoughtful and inclusive approach will avoid exacerbation of existing divisions and build a future where the rights of all will be guaranteed.