The National Assembly Commission of Inquiry, which recently heard the Attorney General as well as the first president of the Court of Auditors dated May 13, 2025, reports a crucial problem for both governance and institutional integrity in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Indeed, transparency in the recruitment and promotion of agents of the Court of Auditors is essential to guarantee public confidence in the use of public funds, in particular in an often tumultuous economic context.
### context and importance of the survey
The chairman of the commission of inquiry, deputy Paul Gaspard Ngondankoy Nkoy Ea Loonga, underlined the need to clarify practices in terms of human resources within this key institution. At a time when the question of corruption and favoritism is significant in public debate, it is imperative to ensure that the selection mechanisms are not only just but also transparent. The recurrence of allegations of corruption in various sectors of public administration calls for increased vigilance and a desire to reform.
The National Assembly, as a control body, plays a significant role in this approach. His investment in this survey illustrates his role as defender of the rights of citizens in the face of possible abuses. However, despite the apparent good will, the way in which this investigation is carried out can also arouse questions. Does the fact that a group of magistrates from the Court of Auditors opposed hearing, means that there is resistance or discomfort within the institution in the face of such investigation? This raises questions about the culture of transparency and responsibility within the latter.
### The implications of an efficient court of accounts
A functional and impartial court of accounts is an essential pillar for any democracy, because it guarantees a framework where public funds are managed with the necessary seriousness and diligence. In fragile economic contexts, such as that of the DRC, where comparatively limited resources must be allocated optimally, the effectiveness of this institution becomes all the more crucial. Strengthening public confidence in institutions is a fundamental issue that can have deep repercussions on citizen participation and economic development.
Beyond the simple requirement of rigor, it is important to ask: what concrete reforms are proposed? How can they be implemented to strengthen the integrity and efficiency of recruitment processes? The answers to these questions will determine not only the future of the Court of Auditors, but also the perception that citizens have of it.
### Reflections on governance
It is undeniable that an investigation like this must be carried out with the highest integrity and impartiality. As a result, the role of the media, such as those relayed by Fatshimetrics, becomes essential to ensure balanced coverage of events and avoid excessive polarization of discourse. Far from creating a climate of distrust, it is a question of opening a dialogue which will make it possible to build a future based on mutual responsibility and respect for institutions.
Through this investigation, the National Assembly has a unique opportunity to initiate discussions on broader questions of governance, citizen engagement and responsibility. Rather than limiting itself to examining internal procedures, it could be beneficial to expand the field of reflection to encourage systemic reforms. What new standards could be set up to strengthen confidence in institutions? These must also involve citizens and their representatives, in order to ensure a collective response to governance challenges.
### Conclusion
In short, the commission of inquiry on the recruitment and management of human resources within the Court of Auditors is an important step towards better governance in the DRC. However, it requires a carefully balanced and resolved approach, aimed at guaranteeing not only transparency, but also commitment and dialogue with all stakeholders. In the end, this could determine whether the DRC will manage to establish the foundations of a trustworthy institution, capable of truly serving the public interest. This survey is therefore a pivotal moment, not only for the Court of Auditors, but also for the entire state architecture of the country.