Afflux of nearly 15,000 South Sudanese refugees in Ituri raises humanitarian challenges for local communities in the Democratic Republic of Congo.


** The influx of South Sudanese refugees in the ITUI province: a humanitarian challenge to be met **

Nearly 15,000 refugees fleeing violence in South Sudan recently found refuge in several villages in the territory of Aru, in the ITUI province, in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). This situation, which develops before our eyes, highlights crucial humanitarian issues while the assistance mechanisms are disadvantaged. Karim Adidi, head of the antenna of the National Commission for Refugees (CNR) in Aru, underlines the lack of aid organized in this vulnerable region, where local families are trying to welcome these people in distress.

The villages of Gole, Ulendere, Okaba and Kole, located on the border with South Sudan, thus become the theater of a humanitarian crisis that intensifies. As of May 8, 2025, more than 14,400 refugees had been recorded in these localities, a figure which could further increase with the new daily arrivals due to persistent conflicts in South Sudan.

### An alarming situation

South-Sudanese refugees often arrive in precarious conditions, having fled armed clashes with little or without personal effects. Their needs are immediate and urgent: housing, health care, access to food and other essential services are sorely lacking. As Mr. Adidi indicates, apart from the spontaneous solidarity of the reception communities, no humanitarian aid is still being deployed on a large scale.

This situation raises the question of the reception capacities of these local communities themselves already vulnerable. How to cope with such a massive influx when resources are limited? Local governments, non-governmental organizations, as well as international agencies, such as the High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR), must act quickly and effectively to respond to this situation which could turn to humanitarian drama.

## Institutional responses

To correctly assess the needs, a multidisciplinary team including the CNR, UNHCR, humanitarian partners, border services and local authorities recently carried out a mission on the ground. This type of initiative is essential to identify the dimensions of the crisis, but it also raises questions about the responsiveness of general humanitarian assistance systems.

It is important to wonder how these structures can be improved to better anticipate and respond to migratory flows caused by conflicts. Emergency planning is a key element that requires special attention, in particular with regard to the implementation of infrastructure for reception and care. Lessons learned from other crises should guide the development of more effective strategies adapted to the complexity of the situation in Ituri.

### Challenges of humanitarian assistance

The question of coordination between the various humanitarian and government actors is also essential. In the current context, where needs are largely exceeding the supply, cooperation and sharing of resources are critical factors to improve support for refugees. A concerted effort could not only provide immediate help, but also contribute to long -term sustainable infrastructure.

In addition, the social and economic dimensions of reception of refugees should be explored. Host communities, although generous, can be easily overloaded. Support for local populations should not be overlooked in assistance efforts. How to integrate refugees so as to strengthen, and not weaken, local dynamics?

### to sustainable solutions

The current dynamics call for a broader reflection on migration flows and refugee management policies. Governments and international organizations must work together not only to respond to the emergency, but also to anticipate future crises. This implies rethinking humanitarian assistance strategies according to different geographic and cultural contexts.

In conclusion, the situation of South Sudanese refugees in the ITUI province is a reflection of a humanitarian challenge that the international community cannot ignore. Local solidarity deserves to be praised, but it cannot constitute the only bulwark in the face of a crisis which requires a global, rapid and efficiently coordinated response. The path to go is sown with pitfalls, but it calls on our collective humanity and our ability to act together in the interest of those who flee violence and instability.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *