** Rehabilitation of the RN1 in Kinshasa: between responsiveness and sustainability **
On May 12, 2025, the situation of the national road n ° 1 (RN1) in Kinshasa drew the attention of the media and citizens. Indeed, damage caused by torrential rains at the town of Mont-Ngafula aroused a rapid response from local authorities, with an 85% balance sheet of the rehabilitation work already carried out, according to Simon Moyombo, an engineer from the Office of Roads (Gold).
This situation highlights the persistent problem of infrastructure in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), a country where climatic challenges, both in terms of precipitation and erosion, raise many concerns. The road manufacturer, in this context, must not only ensure that the work is carried out quickly, but also in a lasting way, capable of withstanding climatic hazards.
The RN1, 3086.7 km long, is essential because it links several large cities, such as Kinshasa, Lubumbashi, and many others. The connection between these regions is crucial for the economic and social development of the country. However, recent events reveal the urgency and the importance of a rigorous approach to urban planning and the maintenance of infrastructure.
The work done on the RN1 in Mont-Ngafula seems to meet an immediate necessity, which is to be greet. Ms. Christelle Kasongo, resident of the region, expressed shared feelings: support for the responsiveness of the authorities, coupled with a request for continuity and project monitoring, to ensure that similar disasters do not happen again. His concern raises a crucial question: how to guarantee that rehabilitation efforts are not a simple short -term reaction, but are part of a long -term strategy for infrastructure development?
The experience of many cities around the world shows that, faced with climate change, it is imperative to integrate sustainable solutions within the framework of infrastructure projects. This implies the creation of water pipes mentioned by Mr. Moyombo, but also the implementation of effective drainage systems and buffer areas that can help catch and manage rainwater.
The question of compliance with urban planning standards, mentioned by the engineer, is also central. Indeed, the rapid urbanization of Kinshasa, coupled with sometimes deficient environmental management, contributes to erosion and flood problems. An active community commitment is therefore essential. Citizens play a role in compliance with these standards, but also in early alert on possible non -compliant work.
It is also interesting to question the transparency and resource management within the framework of these projects. What mechanisms are put in place to follow the progress of the work and guarantee that the allocated funds are used efficiently? In an economic context where the priorities are numerous, the rehabilitation of infrastructure must be part of a global approach which includes the active participation of economic actors and civil society organizations.
Finally, the current situation could set another challenge: that of education and awareness of citizens on environmental issues. The development of a civic culture and an awareness of ecology is necessary to strengthen the resilience of the neighborhoods in the face of climatic hazards. This can go through education workshops on good practices by undertaking construction work, or even awareness campaigns concerning the importance of environmental conservation.
In conclusion, the rehabilitation of the RN1 in Kinshasa in the face of the challenges posed by difficult climatic conditions is a positive step. However, this must open the way to a broader reflection on sustainability, infrastructure management and the role of citizens in the implementation of sustainable solutions. Thus, the interaction between immediate reactivity and long -term planning is essential to build a future where infrastrurs meet the needs of an increasing population while respecting the environmental challenges of the DRC.