### Political crisis in Côte d’Ivoire: the case of Tidjane Thiam and the expectations of her sympathizers
Côte d’Ivoire is at a crucial crossroads with political tensions that resurface following the exclusion of candidate Tidjane Thiam from the presidential race. This decision has aroused calls to demonstrate on the part of his sympathizers, who seek to express their support in the face of what they consider a political injustice. It is essential to take a moment to examine the different facets of this situation, taking into account the potential implications both for the political landscape and for Ivorian society as a whole.
#### Political context
Tidjane Thiam, former director general of Credit Suisse, recently emerged as a central figure within the Ivorian opposition. His exclusion from the ballot could be perceived as a blow for the party of African peoples-Côte d’Ivoire (PPA CI) that he represents. This event does not occur in an emptiness, but in a context of exacerbated political tensions which go back to several years, often marked by disputed elections and rivalries between former allies that have become adversaries.
The decision of the electoral authority to exclude Thiam could refer to technical or legal reasons, but it is also likely to be interpreted as a political maneuver to weaken the opposition. Historical precedents of political tensions in Côte d’Ivoire encourage caution. Indeed, the country experienced a civil war in 2002 and post-electoral violence in 2010 which left lasting scars on society.
### demonstrations and their implications
The calls to demonstrate before the courts evoke a mobilization of the sympathizers of Thiam who seek to display a peaceful resistance while claiming their political rights. Manifestations can be a means of democratic expression, however, the opinion of the authorities – who have warned that “disorder will not be tolerated” – underlines a persistent concern about the way in which these events could degenerate.
It is important to ask the question: how to guarantee that the expression of political dissatisfaction is done while respecting the rules of public order while preserving the right to manifestation? The previous mobilizations in Côte d’Ivoire have shown that tensions can quickly climb if communication between authorities and citizens are not guaranteed.
### towards constructive solutions
The challenge lies in the search for solutions which not only soothe tensions, but also promote inclusive political dialogue. The plurality of opinions is a wealth for a democracy, and the effective management of the grievances expressed by the opposition could strengthen confidence between the different political factions and the institutions.
Expert observations in Ivorian politics could play a key role. What do they recommend to peacefully manage these demonstrations while developing communication mechanisms between government and opposition? A framework for dialogue, clear and accessible, could not only make the voices heard in disagreement, but also strengthen the country’s democratic institutions.
#### Conclusion
The current situation in Côte d’Ivoire is emblematic of the complexity of political relations in the country, where the exclusion of a candidate can rekindle deeply anchored emotions and expectations of changes. The outcome of this crisis could determine the political future of the country, but it also underlines the need for constructive commitment on the part of all stakeholders. The search for a balance between public order and the right to expression is essential for a sustainable democracy.
In this delicate context, the role of the media, experts and civil society cannot be underestimated; They constitute mediation actors who could contribute to an enlightened and constructive debate for the future of Côte d’Ivoire.