** Title: Tensions within the Sacred Union: the struggle of powers at the heart of Congolese policy **
Politics in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) is an area where rivalries and power struggles are often manifested, reflecting the complexity of a system in search of cohesion. The recent declarations of Modeste Bahati, leader of the Alliance of Democratic Forces of Congo and Allies (AFDC-A), against André Mbata, permanent secretary of the Sacred Union, but also former professor of constitutional law, illustrate how constantly evolving this dynamic.
### A fight for legitimacy
Bahati, considering himself the “second force” within the government, accuses Mbata of usurpation of power. This conflict is not only a question of personalities, but is part of a broader context of political governance weakened by centralizing tendencies within the sacred union. Bahati’s purpose highlights a central problem in political regimes: that of legitimacy. Who really has power? A question that seems to resonate through the corridors of power in Kinshasa.
Bahati asserts a fundamental principle of democracy, that of the association and the consideration of the various political actors, a point which represents a crucial issue for the future of this platform. The reproaches he formulates against Mbata, which try to redefine the alliances and impose new governance modes without a general consensus, underline the difficulty of building a solid coalition when major actors feel marginalized.
### A context steeped in history
The apparent conflict between Bahati and Mbata also evokes a history of tensions within the political coalitions in the DRC. Since the country’s first democratic elections, alliances have often been made and defeated, marked by betrayals, temporary strategic alliances and an incessant struggle for power. These tensions can be compared to the experiences of other African countries where fragile coalitions collapse when the personal ambitions of the leaders take precedence over common orientations.
In a more current way, the fracture observed between Bahati and Mbata can also be perceived as a reflection of the challenges faced by the Félix Tshisekedi regime. Although the president was perceived as an actor in change, the management of internal friction could potentially thwart his initiatives in terms of stability and peace, necessary for the DRC. Instead of forging solid alliances, the current climate of distrust between these actors can strengthen political instability and harm the implementation of the promises of our head of state.
### The voice of political partners
Bahati’s criticisms go beyond simple internal maneuvers: they challenge all political actors on the need for inclusive and participative governance. In a context where the DRC seeks international support for its security and development, the perception of marginalization could also affect the image of the country on the international scene. Society reforms must take into account the divergent voices within the Sacred Union to build a relationship of trust.
### The point of view of an external observer
A more distant analysis underlines the need for an internal dialogue, but also with external allies. Countries that have succeeded in establishing stable governments have often integrated mechanisms that promote transparent discussions, even in the face of internal adversities. Conflicts between Bahati and Mbata could serve as a trigger for a strategic reflection on the way in which Congolese political actors approach the art of collaborative governance.
It becomes essential that the DRC political leaders are aware of the importance of transparency, equity and receptivity to criticism. Ultimately, the resolution of this tension could not only strengthen the internal cohesion of the sacred union, but also forge a governance model which is based on better inclusion and consideration of the various stakeholders.
### Conclusion
In short, the quarrel between Bahati and Mbata, far from being a simple conflict of personalities, is a reflection of a more crucial democratic issue: the ability to build truly inclusive governance. The DRC, in the face of development and security challenges, cannot ignore these power struggles which may compromise its objectives. The release of this internal crisis may well be the key to ensuring a more stable and prosperous political future for the nation. It is imperative that political leaders learn to consider the interests of others, and not only theirs, to build together a pacified and united DRC.