** Title: A call to dialogue: Congolese civil society in the face of the multidimensional crisis **
On March 17, 2023, in Kinshasa, Congolese civil society, bringing together various movements, dynamics, platforms and associations, launched an appeal to the adhesion of other components, including political and social forces. This call aims to initiate a direct dialogue between the government and the rebel group M23, a strong signal in the face of a security crisis in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) which transcends the simple military framework.
### A multifacete crisis
Danny Singoma, Executive Secretary of the Democracy Promotion Network and Economic and Social Rights (Proddes), has well articulated the complexity of this crisis. The issues are not limited only to the presence of the M23, but include political, social and economic dimensions deeply rooted in Congolese reality. The recent tragic and recurring events, such as massacres in Ituri and violence in other provinces such as Grand-Katanga and Maï-ndombe, illustrate the multidimensionality of this conflict.
Beyond the armed struggles, these crises highlight crucial socio-economic issues: poverty, access to education, and regional inequalities exacerbated by decades of instability. The DRC, a country rich in natural resources, is trapped in a cycle of violence and exploitation, where its wealth often benefits external actors rather than its population.
### The need for inclusive dialogue
The call to an inclusive dialogue formulated by civil society could be perceived as a glimmer of hope in a landscape dominated by distrust and divisions. Singoma stresses that the future of the DRC must be considered around a table bringing together all the components of the nation. A real and open dialogue is essential to explore lasting solutions that go beyond military tactics.
The involvement of the various stakeholders – governments, M23, but also civil society organizations – is crucial. But why does such a dialogue take so long to materialize? Conflicts are often exacerbated by polarizing speeches and actors who benefit from the division of populations, making the construction of a lasting peace more delicate.
### Comparative approaches: History Lessons
Around the world, other nations having crossed similar crises have often found outlines by the inclusion of civil society in peace negotiations. Take the example of the peace process in Colombia. Allies of rebel movements have been integrated into dialogues, while ensuring that the voices of the victims and disadvantaged groups are heard. This made it possible to explore the roots of the conflict more, generating a more holistic approach to peace.
In addition, studies show that dialogues open with a strong societal component have increased probabilities of long -term success. A report by the Foundation for World Peace stresses that “including civil society in negotiations can reduce the risk of resumption of violence by 64 %.” This figure demonstrates how vital it is not to relegate the voice of citizens to a second level.
### A mobilization that goes beyond the simple declaration
The civil society declaration occurred shortly after the launch of a national peace and national cohesion campaign by seven organizations. This marks a significant turning point in the way in which non -state actors perceive their role: no longer as simple observers but as active actors of peace.
It is imperative that this dynamic continues and intensifies. The votes of civil society, as representatives of various strata of the population, must be integrated into the decision -making process. The challenge now lies in the implementation of a real framework for dialogue which is both inclusive and respectful of the multiple voices that make up the country.
### Conclusion: a future between dialogue and action
The call launched by Congolese civil society is a strong signal and a marker of hope for a peaceful future. However, this call constitutes only an initial step in a long way to the resolution of a complex crisis. It is now crucial that all stakeholders come together around the negotiation table, not only to discuss immediate security issues, but also to tackle the deep roots of conflicts. The DRC cannot afford the luxury of seeing its future dictated only by belligerents. His civil society, with all its diversity, must be at the heart of the country’s revitalization and reconstruction process.
Thus, it is essential to strengthen the mechanisms of awareness and education for peace in the country, to prepare the ground for a truly inclusive dialogue. Congolese society deserves a powerful voice in the narration of its own future.