** Politics in Diego-Suarez: between democratic legitimacy and oblique political maneuvers **
The political situation in Diego-Suarez is a reflection of the tensions that cross the Malagasy political landscape. The eviction of mayor Jean-Luc Djavojozara shortly after his re-election poses questions about democratic practices and the way in which power is exercised in Madagascar. While the municipal elections of January 20 seemed to offer a respite, with a notable victory of Djavojozara at more than 65%, political reality is unexpected, highlighting a deeper crisis.
** A troubled context: between conquest of power and management of public affairs **
The ascent of Jean-Luc Djavojozara, a local figure often perceived as anti-system because of his opposition to the regime in place, undoubtedly resonated with the expectations of a population in search of change. However, the prolonged absence of the elected mayor, lightened by an arrest warrant for embezzlement – an accusation that his supporters denounce as purely political – opened a breach that the prefect quickly exploited. This post vacation, activated so quickly by the administrative court, questions judicial and political normality within this commune in the past so heavy.
The taxation of Tiana Edmond, the campaign director of the Djavojozara’s political adversary, is only strengthening the feeling that democracy in Diego-Suarez is in danger. Indeed, it is not only a change of elected official, but a questioning of the popular will. The choice of a president of special delegation, close to the power in place, seems to say that voters can be bypassed without real repercussions. This extremely rare event is part of a wider set of political instability in Madagascar.
** The impact of tourism in decline: a disturbing parallel with local policy **
While Diego-Suarez fights against the absence of tourists-its main source of income-the current political situation could have considerable economic implications. The Bay of Diego-Suarez, famous for its grandiose landscapes, suffers from the abandonment of visitors, and tourism, which should have been a reason for prosperity, becomes a mirror of internal conflicts.
The closure of the borders due to the Pandemic of Covid-19 has already disrupted this fragile economy, but the political maneuvers underlying the decision to appoint a PDS raise the question of confidence, not only towards local institutions but also on the International plan. Investors crossed on the decision can represent a long -term risk, while the city is desperately looking to restore its coat of arms with travel agencies and tourists. If the political climate is perceived as unstable, the chances of economic development become even thinner.
** Legitimacy or illegitimacy: the reaction of civil society **
The reactions of political actors and citizens show that an important fringe of the population does not intend to leave this situation unnoticed. The declarations of figures like René Rasolofo bear witness to a desire for change. The Malagasy remember the periods of dictatorship and the diversions of democracy. The crisis of confidence in their leaders could lead to a citizen protest movement.
The suspension of the mayor’s activity could, paradoxically, galvanize the supports of Djavojozara, who see him in him a victim of an authoritarian system. Through social networks, rumors about mobilization are increasing, and a new generation of activists may well emerge, nourished by a discourse of justice and democracy.
** Conclusion: towards inevitable reconciliation or permanent tensions? **
The Djavojozara affair is not just a matter of local policy. It questions the very nature of Malagasy democracy and citizens’ right to choose their representatives. The emergence of a PDS, without the legitimacy of a vote, is not without effects. Civil society, opposition political movements and even foreign investors scrutinize the situation with some concern.
It would be relevant that the sovereign bodies of the Malagasy state seriously look at the ramifications of this case. The path to follow could well be that of reconciliation, by restoring democratic rights and by restoring the citizens of Diego-Suarez the opportunity to choose their leaders. Otherwise, the spectrum of an increasing division mixed with economic misery could settle permanently, transforming what is formerly considered as a bastion of democracy into a showcase of all the dangers that await it.