The government of the Democratic Republic of Congo is once again at the center of harsh criticism leveled against the Minister of Infrastructure and Public Works, Alexis Gisaro, by a motion tabled by 57 national deputies. This motion, which has ignited debates in the National Assembly, highlights the growing concern of the people’s representatives regarding the management of the country’s infrastructure and the implementation of government projects.
The motion, led by Marcel Zuma of the UDPS, denounces the inefficiency and lack of tangible results of flagship projects such as Kinshasa zero hole and Tshilejelu, which are pillars of Félix Tshisekedi’s presidential vision. The signatory deputies regret the delay in the implementation of these projects, despite the substantial funding allocated, which leaves Congolese citizens waiting for improved living conditions.
The cessation or absence of work on the ground, particularly in Kinshasa, is pointed out as a flagrant testimony to the failure of the government’s infrastructure policy. MPs also highlight the imbalance within government structures responsible for public works, which are failing to respond effectively to the needs of the population. This situation highlights the gap between political promises and the reality on the ground, thus fueling a feeling of mistrust and dissatisfaction within Congolese society.
During the parliamentary session dedicated to the explanations of Minister Alexis Gisaro, dissatisfied MPs expressed their doubts about the ministry’s ability to realize the presidential ambitions in terms of infrastructure. The explanations provided by the minister were not considered convincing, thus intensifying tensions within the National Assembly.
Faced with this worrying situation, elected officials are now demanding clear accounts and concrete actions from the government to redress the balance in the infrastructure sector and ensure sustainable development for the entire Congolese population. This motion constitutes an urgent call for better management of public resources and more transparent and effective government action to meet the legitimate expectations of citizens.
In conclusion, the motion against Alexis Gisaro reflects the urgency of rethinking public policies in terms of infrastructure in the Democratic Republic of Congo. It is imperative that the government take concrete measures to address the shortcomings observed and implement an ambitious and transparent action plan to improve the living conditions of the population.