The case involving renowned human rights lawyer, Dele Farotimi, has been in the spotlight for some time. Indeed, his recent court appearance has sparked strong reactions and raised questions about freedom of expression and the limits of defending individual rights.
Farotimi is currently in detention until 20 December 2024, following accusations of defamation brought against him by renowned jurist Chief Afe Babalola. The allegations stem from Farotimi’s statements in his book, “Nigeria and its Criminal Justice System”, which Babalola claims are detrimental to his reputation.
During his interrogation last week, Farotimi pleaded not guilty, saying the allegations are unfounded. Controversy also erupted during the hearing regarding Farotimi’s legal representation. Prosecutor Samson Osobu challenged the presence of Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) Adeyinka Olumide-Fusika, citing a July 2024 Court of Appeal ruling that barred SANs from representing clients in magistrates’ courts.
Faced with the objection, Olumide-Fusika argued by presenting the laws of the Ekiti State Magistrates’ Court that allow any lawyer to appear in criminal cases. “The restriction cited by the prosecution does not apply in this jurisdiction,” he said.
The decision on the prosecutor’s objection was deferred by Justice Adeosun, who is to review the ruling in question. Pending the decision, Olumide-Fusika withdrew from the case, assigning the defence to lawyer Taiwo Adedeji.
Farotimi’s bail hearing is scheduled for December 20, with Justice Adeosun ordering his continued detention pending. The case highlights issues of freedom of expression, respect for individual reputation and fairness in the justice system. Its outcome promises to be crucial for the legal world and the cause of human rights in Nigeria.