The political news in the Democratic Republic of Congo is marked by heated debates surrounding the reduction of the standard of living of institutions. National MP Flory Mapamboli recently drew attention to a flagrant imbalance in the implementation of this decision. During discussions around the amending Finance Act, he pointed out a disparity between the reduction in appropriations allocated to Parliament and the significant increase in those allocated to the government.
This criticism by Flory Mapamboli highlights a legitimate questioning of the way in which the government defines and implements the reduction of the standard of living of institutions. Indeed, the decrease of more than 17% in appropriations for Parliament contrasts sharply with the increase of more than 24% in appropriations allocated to the Government Secretariat. This situation raises questions about transparency and fairness in the distribution of budgetary resources.
The MP also stressed the importance of taking into account objective criteria, such as the surface area of territories, in the distribution of appropriations. He pointed out that territories such as Kasongo-Lunda, larger than some entire provinces, receive the same level of credit as smaller areas. This geographical inequality poses a real challenge in terms of justice and equity in access to public resources.
Through his interventions, Flory Mapamboli highlights the difficulties faced by certain regions of the DRC, such as Kwango, which are plagued by isolation, malnutrition and alarming underdevelopment. He stresses the need for a more equitable distribution of resources to meet the specific needs of these marginalized regions.
This controversy over the imbalance in the execution of budgetary decisions in the DRC underlines the crucial importance of transparent and fair management of public funds. The issue of reducing the standard of living of institutions must not only be limited to political speeches, but must be translated into concrete actions that are equitable and in line with the real needs of the populations.
In conclusion, this controversy highlights the challenges facing the DRC in terms of governance and social justice. It underlines the need for a profound reform of the budgetary system and decision-making based on objective and transparent criteria. It is imperative that the authorities commit to ensuring that public resources are managed in a fair, equitable and in line with the real needs of the Congolese population.