Fatshimetrie: The crucial importance of coordination and trust in the fight against epidemics
In a world facing an unprecedented global pandemic, it is essential to recognize the imperative for coordination and trust in managing health crises. Recent news has highlighted the challenges of responding to outbreaks such as H5N1 avian influenza, commonly known as avian influenza, and the direct consequences of gaps in these key areas.
The U.S. response to the H5N1 avian flu has been criticized for being slow and uncoordinated, highlighting the potential risks of such failures. With the detection of three cases in people in the United States and outbreaks in livestock herds from Michigan to Texas, Idaho to North Carolina, it is clear that the virus is widespread among animals. To protect human and animal populations and preserve the economy while restoring public confidence in public health, it is imperative to act in an effective and coordinated manner.
Interestingly, countries like Finland were able to anticipate and contain the H5N1 virus before it spread to humans. By highlighting their proactive response, Finland demonstrated three key elements that could be applied in the U.S. response to H5N1 avian influenza.
First, a rapid response was crucial. In Finland, authorities confirmed in less than 24 hours that animals on a mink farm tested positive for the H5N1 virus. Human and animal health specialists collaborated immediately to track infections, including testing at-risk workers on farms where animals were infected. In contrast, in the United States, the spread of H5N1 avian influenza among livestock remained unknown for months due to insufficient testing. Compliance with the 7-1-7 principle of detection and response, i.e. detecting a suspected outbreak within seven days, notifying health authorities within one day, and responding within seven days, is essential to contain epidemics in time.
Second, trust plays a crucial role. In Finland, breeders already had a relationship of trust with health authorities, reinforced by effective programs, which facilitated cooperation during the crisis. Farmers were quickly compensated for animals slaughtered to stem the spread of the virus, boosting the agricultural sector’s confidence in the government. On the other hand, trust in the American government, particularly in rural areas affected by epidemics, is lower. Additional measures to protect the agricultural sector may be necessary.
Finally, a coordinated government response is essential. In Finland, close collaboration between human and animal health authorities has been established, facilitating a rapid and effective response. In the United States, coordination between government agencies responsible for animal and human health remains a challenge, requiring harmonization of priorities, legal authorities, and improved agility to respond to crises effectively.
In conclusion, managing epidemics such as H5N1 avian influenza requires rapid coordination, mutual trust and a well-coordinated government response. It is imperative that lessons learned from current crises are put into practice to better prepare societies to face future health threats. With increased vigilance and increased cooperation between all stakeholders involved, we will be able to better protect public health and ensure the resilience of communities in the face of future epidemics.