The recent statement by the National Research Institute of Astronomy and Geophysics (NRIAG) in Egypt in response to Dutch researcher Frank Hoogerbeets’ predictions of a strong earthquake hitting the Earth in the coming days has sparked keen interest.
According to the NRIAG, predicting earthquakes is a complex task that requires solid scientific evidence. Sherif al-Hady, head of the seismology department at NRIAG, pointed out that although earthquakes can be predicted, it is difficult to predict their exact occurrence, as this requires concrete scientific evidence, and they can occur suddenly.
He said Hoogerbeets’ predictions concern areas where earthquakes are expected periodically, which should not cause concern. Regarding Egypt, although it may be exposed to moderate earthquakes, their real impact on the territory remains uncertain.
Taha Rabeh, director of NRIAG, was keen to emphasize that Frank Hoogerbeets is not a scientist but an astrologer who tends to follow trends. He warned against unfounded rumors about an increase in earthquakes and said such phenomena remain a natural part of Earth’s dynamics, occurring daily.
It is reassuring to learn that Egypt is in a relatively safe zone when it comes to earthquakes, with the latter occurring mainly away from residential areas. Records from seismological stations only reveal earthquakes that have already been identified, and there is therefore no need to panic in the face of potential imminent seismic disasters.
This clarification from NRIAG highlights the importance of relying on solid scientific evidence, while avoiding giving in to baseless alarmist theories. It is essential to maintain a critical and rational mind when faced with the various information relayed, especially when it comes to sensitive subjects such as earthquakes and other natural disasters.