The recent debate on the proposal to lift the moratorium on the death penalty for soldiers guilty of treason in the Democratic Republic of Congo has sparked varied reactions among the population.
Julie, an executive in a construction company, believes that this measure should be extended to anyone guilty of treason, not just the military. She affirms that in the current context of the country, such severity could help to impose respect for the law at all levels of society.
In another opinion, Nduta, a medical student, sees this proposal as a way to restore peace in the DRC, by dissuading traitors and putting an end to the insecurity plaguing certain regions of the country.
As for Naomie, an assistant at the psychology faculty, she supports the idea by emphasizing the importance of media coverage of the trials of those guilty of treason to guarantee transparency and protect the innocent.
However, Divine, a law student, highlights the need for justice reform to ensure respect for the Constitution and the restoration of the rule of law, suggesting that the death penalty will not resolve the underlying problems of the judicial system.
Finally, Nicole, a communications student, expresses her disagreement with the proposal, considering that human life must be protected and that other alternatives exist to punish acts of treason.
Faced with these diverse opinions, it is clear that the question of the death penalty in cases of treason raises legitimate opinions and concerns among the Congolese population. It is essential to engage in open and constructive dialogue to find balanced solutions that respect everyone’s rights.