In the first five months of his presidency, President Tinubu took part in 14 international trips, totaling 71 days spent outside the country. This frequency of two trips per month, for an average duration of five days each, has sparked criticism, notably from the leader of the opposition, Atiku Abubakar, who described the president as “tourist in chief”.
Critics of these trips say they are superfluous and extravagant, particularly in Nigeria’s current economic climate. Indeed, according to reports, Tinubu’s travel expenses exceeded the allocated budget by 36%, reaching approximately ₦3.4 billion ($2.2 million) during the first six months of his presidency.
Faced with rising inflation, persistent unemployment and security challenges, some say the president should pay more attention to the country’s internal affairs.
Tinubu defends himself by saying that these trips are essential to attract foreign investment and strengthen Nigeria’s diplomatic ties. Recently, he announced a 60% reduction in the size of his delegation during his travels, but critics remain skeptical about the overall cost and effectiveness of these trips.
Kenyan President William Ruto is also criticized for his frequent international travel, earning him the nickname “the flying president.” This trend raises questions about the priority given to domestic affairs by traveling political leaders.
It is essential that leaders nationalize their policies, responding to the urgent needs of their countries, while seeking to establish strong and fruitful international relations.