Title: Kabila-Tshisekedi agreement: the UDPS accuses the former head of state of being behind the comments of Corneille Nangaa
Introduction :
In a recent political development in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), the Union for Democracy and Social Progress (UDPS) has accused former President Joseph Kabila of being behind the statements of the former president of the Electoral Commission National Independent (CENI), Corneille Nangaa. These accusations have reignited political tensions between supporters of Kabila and those of the current president, Félix Tshisekedi. Let’s analyze the details of this situation.
The political context in the DRC:
Since President Félix Tshisekedi came to power in 2019, after controversial elections, political tensions have continued to persist in the DRC. The country experienced a period of transition with a coalition government between Tshisekedi’s UDPS and Kabila’s Front Commun pour le Congo (FCC). However, suspicions persist about a supposed secret political agreement between Kabila and Tshisekedi, an agreement officially denied by both parties.
Corneille Nangaa’s statements:
Corneille Nangaa, former president of the CENI, recently reaffirmed the existence of a political agreement between Tshisekedi and Kabila during the 2018 elections. According to him, this agreement allowed Tshisekedi to win the presidency and ensured a peaceful transition from power. These statements provoked strong reactions, notably from the UDPS, which accuses Kabila of being behind Nangaa’s remarks.
The UDPS accusations:
Augustin Kabuya, secretary general of the UDPS, said Kabila was behind Nangaa’s statements and was seeking to expose Tshisekedi by questioning the legitimacy of his presidential mandate. Kabuya stressed that the results of the 2018 elections were welcomed with jubilation by the population, which proves according to him that the people’s choice was respected. He also recalled the tensions and violence which accompanied the proclamation of the results in 2011.
The consequences and issues:
These accusations and revelations call into question political stability in the DRC and highlight the persistent divisions between supporters of Kabila and those of Tshisekedi. If the existence of a secret agreement were proven, it could have significant repercussions on the legitimacy of the current president and on the people’s confidence in the electoral process. It is crucial for the DRC to clarify this situation and ensure the transparency of the political process to preserve the stability of the country.
Conclusion :
The UDPS accusations against Joseph Kabila and the declarations of Corneille Nangaa have reignited political tensions in the DRC. The question of the existence of a secret political agreement between Kabila and Tshisekedi remains at the heart of the debates. It is imperative that the truth be established and measures taken to ensure political stability and people’s confidence in the electoral process. The DRC is going through a crucial period in its political history, and the outcome of this situation could have major consequences for the country and its citizens.