Title: Partial lifting of the state of siege in North Kivu and Ituri: A step towards normalization, but questions persist
Introduction :
The President of the Republic recently announced the progressive and gradual lifting of the state of siege in North Kivu and Ituri, sparking mixed reactions from local leaders. While this decision is seen as a step towards normalization, some are raising concerns about its impact on local administration and its ability to meet the expectations of populations affected by armed groups. In this article, we will take a closer look at the head of state’s decision and the divergent opinions that arise from it.
The context of the state of siege:
For several years, the provinces of North Kivu and Ituri have faced persistent insecurity caused by the presence of armed groups. To deal with this situation, the government declared a state of siege last May, giving extensive powers to security forces to fight against armed groups and restore order. This measure has aroused both hope and concern among local populations.
Mixed reactions:
The decision of the President of the Republic to partially lift the state of siege was received in a contrasting manner by the leaders of North Kivu and Ituri. Some, like Jean Claude Tshilumbayi, law professor and provincial deputy, have expressed reservations about the constitutionality of this reclassification. They fear this will create confusion within the local administration and undermine the progress made so far in the fight against armed groups.
For his part, Jackson Ause, national deputy for Irumu and executive of Ensemble pour la République, an opposition political party, believes that the reclassification of the state of siege does not meet the expectations of the population of Ituri. . He emphasizes that armed groups have been active since 2017 in the region and that more vigorous measures are needed to guarantee the safety of residents.
On the other hand, Augustin Muhesi, professor of political science at the University of Goma and researcher, takes a more nuanced point of view. He recognizes that the partial lifting of the state of siege can be seen as a step towards normalization, but also underlines the importance of maintaining pressure on armed groups and putting in place sustainable security strategies.
Conclusion :
The partial lifting of the state of siege in North Kivu and Ituri represents a step towards the normalization of these regions marked by chronic insecurity. However, divergent reactions from local leaders highlight the complex challenges facing the government in its fight against armed groups. It is essential to continue efforts to ensure the security of populations, while guaranteeing respect for constitutional rights and promoting the reconstruction and development of regions affected by the conflict.
Despite the questions that persist, it is encouraging to note that discussions are underway to find lasting solutions to insecurity in these provinces. Only dialogue and a holistic approach will allow us to overcome the challenges and allow the inhabitants of North Kivu and Ituri to live in peace and security.