Title: The challenges of displaying electoral lists in the DRC
Introduction:
The recent announcement by the Independent National Electoral Commission (CENI) on the impossibility of physically displaying the provisional lists of voters in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) sparked strong reactions. While the CENI cites logistical and security problems, many political actors and observers question the implications of this decision for the electoral process. In this article, we will analyze the issues related to the display of electoral lists in the DRC and the proposed alternatives.
The context of the decision:
According to the CENI, the impossibility of physically displaying the provisional lists of voters is due to the lack of physical space in its branches and the risk of vandalism or bad weather. It therefore offers consultation of the lists with a “Display Officer” agent at each branch and on its website. This decision is criticized by certain political actors and observers.
Criticisms from political actors:
The electoral observation mission of the CENCO-ECC tandem, for example, calls into question this decision of the CENI. According to them, this goes against the electoral law which provides for the possibility for voters, candidates and political parties to consult the lists physically or electronically. They also underline the importance for political parties to have a citizen’s view of these lists in order to evaluate them.
The recommendations of the MOE CENCO-ECC:
Faced with this situation, the MOE CENCO-ECC recommends that the CENI take all necessary measures to physically display the electoral lists in the branches. However, she also emphasizes the need for the government to secure these display sites in order to avoid any acts of vandalism.
Challenges and alternatives:
The impossibility of physically displaying the electoral lists raises several issues. On the one hand, this can limit the transparency of the electoral process and raise doubts about the integrity of the electoral register. On the other hand, it deprives voters and political actors of a possibility to verify and evaluate the lists in a more direct way.
Faced with these challenges, it is necessary to find alternatives. The use of digital tools such as the CENI website can make consultation of the lists more accessible. However, it is essential to guarantee the reliability and security of these platforms in order to prevent any manipulation or electoral fraud.
Conclusion:
The impossibility of physically displaying electoral lists in the DRC raises questions about the transparency of the electoral process. The criticisms of political actors and the recommendations of the MOE CENCO-ECC highlight the importance of finding alternatives to ensure the consultation and evaluation of the lists in an efficient and secure manner. In a context of distrust of the electoral register, it is crucial to ensure that the electoral process in the DRC is transparent and credible.