International artistic cooperation: between freedom and security, what balance should we find?

Freedom of expression and cultural exchange are essential elements for the development of society. This is why the announcement of a possible suspension of artistic cooperation projects with Niger, Mali and Burkina Faso aroused strong indignation on the part of cultural actors and the left.

However, the French government quickly reacted by ensuring that no deprogramming of artists was requested. According to the authorities, this is rather a consequence of the suspension of visa issuance in these countries for security reasons. This measure affects all nationals, and not just artists.

However, this explanation did not satisfy cultural professionals who denounce a policy banning the circulation of artists and their works. They emphasize that this goes against the spirit of freedom and dialogue necessary for international artistic cooperation.

This controversy highlights the complex issues of cultural diplomacy. On the one hand, it is legitimate to take security measures to protect citizens. On the other hand, it is essential to encourage artistic exchanges and cultural diversity.

It is important to emphasize that artists are in no way responsible for political conflicts or crises in their countries of origin. They are, on the contrary, committed actors who use their art to bear witness, denounce and reconcile.

The suspension of cultural cooperation projects with Niger, Mali and Burkina Faso raises broader questions about France’s international cultural policy. Should safety always take precedence over artistic freedom and intercultural dialogue? How can we reconcile these two aspects, often in tension?

Striking a balance between security and freedom is essential to ensure respect for fundamental rights and encourage dialogue between cultures. Artists have a crucial role to play in this dynamic by using their art as a means of rapprochement and mutual understanding.

It is therefore essential to support and encourage artistic cooperation with Niger, Mali and Burkina Faso, ensuring that appropriate security measures are put in place without hindering artistic freedom and free movement of artists.

Alternative solutions can be considered, such as establishing partnerships with local cultural institutions, strengthening virtual exchanges or even organizing events outside the countries concerned. This would make it possible to maintain artistic dialogue while respecting security requirements.

In conclusion, the suspension of artistic cooperation projects with Niger, Mali and Burkina Faso has sparked controversy over France’s international cultural policy.. It is essential to find a balance between security and freedom to enable the development of artistic cooperation and dialogue between cultures. Artists play a crucial role in this dynamic and must be supported in their efforts to promote cultural diversity and mutual understanding.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *