The article “Kinshasa Military Court judges postpone the trial of Salomon Kalonda” paints a portrait of judicial news in the Democratic Republic of Congo. According to reports, the judges decided to postpone the trial of Salomon Kalonda, special adviser to Moïse Katumbi, following a request from the defense.
The defense lawyers claim to have been surprised by the presentation of new incriminating evidence during this first hearing. The Military Court notably accused Salomon Kalonda of treason for allegedly delivering construction materials and equipment to the Armed Forces of the Democratic Republic of Congo (FARDC). In addition, he is also accused of having maintained intelligence with a foreign power with the aim of instigating hostilities or acts of aggression.
The defense also emphasizes its astonishment at the absence of certain charges, such as the possession of a weapon during an opposition demonstration in Kinshasa.
Salomon Kalonda was arrested on May 30 at Ndjili International Airport and then transferred to Ndolo military prison in Kinshasa.
This decision to postpone the trial raises many questions about the evolution of this case and the real reason why new elements have been presented at the last minute. Defense lawyers will now have an extra month to prepare their strategy and assert their client’s rights.
It is essential to follow the evolution of this case, because it highlights the stakes of justice and human rights in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Citizens and international observers are eagerly awaiting the unfolding of the trial and the opportunity for Salomon Kalonda to defend himself against the charges against him.
In conclusion, this postponement of the trial of Salomon Kalonda raises questions about the nature of the new elements presented at the last minute and highlights the challenges of justice in the Democratic Republic of Congo. It is essential to closely follow the development of this case to understand its impact on the judicial system and human rights in the country