Title: State of siege in North Kivu and Ituri: Dissensions within the commissions
Introduction :
The state of siege in North Kivu and Ituri continues to generate debate and tension. While discussions are underway within the framework of a round table in Kinshasa, members of the commission in charge of maintaining the state of siege have decided to slam the door and join the commission on the lifting of this exceptional measure. . This decision highlights the differences and tensions within these commissions responsible for assessing the state of siege in these provinces.
Disagreements within the commission maintaining the state of siege:
Some members of the commission maintaining the state of siege expressed their dissatisfaction and affirmed that they found themselves there against their will. They highlighted the fact that arguments had already been put forward and that some participants tried to impose their point of view, without taking into account the advantages and disadvantages of each argument. This situation led to their decision to leave the commission.
A controversial consultative approach:
The response of the other members of the commission underlined the importance of the consultative approach and the possibility for all participants to give their arguments, even if they disagree with the final decision. However, it is clear that tensions persist and differences of opinion are far from resolved.
The commission on the lifting of the state of siege:
Conversely, the commission in charge of lifting the state of siege seems to be moving more smoothly. Some members stressed the importance of not limiting ourselves to simply lifting the measure, but of proposing concrete recommendations to guarantee peace and stability in the region. They insist on the urgency of achieving concrete results and avoiding unnecessary prolongation of the discussions.
Impacts on the security and political situation:
This situation highlights the challenges faced by the Congolese authorities in managing the state of siege in North Kivu and Ituri. The dissensions within the commissions underline the divergences of visions and interests of the various actors involved. This may have repercussions on the security and political situation in the region, and require a more inclusive and consensual approach to achieve durable solutions.
Conclusion :
The state of siege in North Kivu and Ituri continues to cause tensions and disagreements, as evidenced by the resignations of some members of the commission maintaining the state of siege. It is imperative that the Congolese authorities arrive at a more inclusive and consensual approach to solving the security problems in the region and guaranteeing long-term peace and stability.