The Zando project in Kinshasa highlights accusations of embezzlement and raises questions about the transparency of public management.

The current situation in Kinshasa, the capital of the Democratic Republic of Congo, raises deep and essential questions about the management of public resources and institutional transparency. At the heart of this debate is the Zando project, an initiative to reconstruct the central market that aroused serious accusations of embezzlement of funds and corruption against Gentiny Ngobila, former city governor. This project, presented as a lever for economic revitalization, demonstrates a complex panorama, where contracts to companies with little familiar companies and financing mechanisms raise important questions about their efficiency and their impact on local development. Far from stopping at this case, the report of the public spending observatory widens the field of analysis to the larger problem of corruption within political institutions, thus questioning the capacity of the provincial assembly to exercise effective control. The need for institutional reforms and greater transparency appears to be a major issue for the future of governance in Kinshasa.
### The shadows of the Zando project: Exploration of a financial scandal in Kinshasa

#### Context and raised accusations

The Congolese capital, Kinshasa, faces an unprecedented tumult with serious accusations targeting Gentiny Ngobila, former governor of the city, for embezzlement, corruption and illicit enrichment. The Observatory of Public Expenditure (ODEP) recently supported these allegedly with detailed evidence, evoking a complex predation system which compromises the economic and social future of the megalopolis. In the light of these events, an in-depth analysis of the situation is essential to better understand the underlying political and economic issues.

### The Zando project: Objectives and realities

Presented as a flagship initiative, the Kinshasa central market reconstruction project, known as Zando, should have been an innovative solution to revitalize this economic lung. However, the report of the Court of Accounts of September 2024 highlights disturbing elements: the contract awarded to Sogema Sarl, a company without notable history or obvious capital, seems to seriously unbalance the balance of power between economic actors. Some experts qualify this “leonin” contract, because it allows the company to receive considerable profits, while unloading the city of implementation costs.

Far from optimistic projections, the financing of the project is based exclusively on a loan from the Sofibanque, reimbursed by the City, questioning the economic viability of this company. In addition, the 20 % of market revenues paid to Sogema for 25 years raise questions about the real contribution of this company to the local economy.

### Controversial management and lack of transparency

The question of transparency is crucial in this case. At no time, was a public control mechanism to monitor financial flows or management efficiency. The benefits of the market, including various taxes and fees, are directly commissioned by Sogema, leaving the capital without guarantee of return on investment. To what extent can such a situation be defendable on the economic, social and ethical level?

On the other hand, it is essential to question the consequences of this stranglehold on economic resources. Without a rigorous preliminary assessment, it is difficult to understand the implications of such management on the economic and social fabric of Kinshasa. The situation raises questions about the sustainability of these choices and on the future of local markets.

### Corruption and neutralization of parliamentary control

The ODEP report is not limited to the drifts of the Zando project alone. He extends his analysis to the broader problem of corruption within the provincial assembly, where irregular financial transactions have been identified. This observation, according to ODEP, jeopardizes the separation of powers, essential to the proper functioning of a democratic state.

In a context where institutions supposed to promote transparency and responsibility are compromised, what is the future of governance in Kinshasa? Corruption, insidious and sometimes systemic, seems to establish links between the different power bodies, reducing the capacity of the provincial assembly to play its role of control.

### towards a sustainable reflection and solutions

Faced with this worrying situation, it is crucial to consider thoughtful solutions, both institutionally and on public projects management mechanisms. The establishment of regular audits, transparency mechanisms and greater involvement in civil society in the monitoring of projects is fundamental to restoring confidence in public institutions.

In addition, strengthening the capacities of control bodies and the education of citizens on their rights and budgetary transparency could help build a kingdom of trust between the State and its citizens. Awareness of the need for responsible governance and the importance of citizen control could help prevent future drifts.

#### Conclusion

The scandal surrounding the Zando project and the accusations against Gentiny Ngobila highlight the crucial challenges that institutions in Kinshasa must take up. Between dubious practices and lack of control, the urgent need for institutional reform is felt to not only prevent corruption, but also guarantee responsible management of public resources. The way towards better governance is sown with pitfalls, but collective awareness and dialogue are essential stages to shed light on the future of the Congolese capital.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *