** Security in the DRC: Towards an unprecedented reflection on the issues of government hearing **
On February 27, 2025, the Defense and Security Commission of the National Assembly of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) summoned five members of the government as part of hearings on the problematic security situation in the east of the country. This event, although it is undeniable importance for understanding the military and diplomatic issues, raises a fundamental question: how can this exercise of transparency and responsibility transform the country’s political and security landscape in the short and long term?
### A complex historical and political context
To fully understand the current situation, it is crucial to take into account the historical heritage of the DRC. Armed conflicts in this region have deep roots, going back to the colonial era, then exacerbated by the wars of the late 1990s and the early 2000s. The east of the country has since become fertile land for various armed groups, including the M23, hypothetically supported by Rwanda. This historical context makes the task of the commission particularly delicate. Hearings are not limited to a simple collection of information; They also plunge into the heart of a complex geopolitical dynamic where accountability can reveal underlying tensions within the government.
### A hearing dynamic as a transformation tool
The hearing led by the Commission chaired by Rubens Mikindo Muhima cannot be seen simply as a response to the current crisis. It is also a potentially transformative mechanism for several reasons. First, this type of parliamentary exercise plays a crucial role in Congolese democracy, where the control of government actions remains an essential problem.
The members of the government, including the Deputy Prime Minister of Defense, Guy Kabombo Mwadiavimta, and the Minister of Finance, Doudou Roussel Fwamba Likunde Li-Botayi, are called upon to account for vital security issues. The importance of these hearings suggests a movement towards a culture of transparency, where the government is involved in a direct dialogue with the people.
### Collective awareness
Auditions are also indicative of collective awareness on a national scale. For the first time, the security issues in the east of the country seem to have repercussions on a broader civic consciousness. The Congolese people, traditionally plagued by disillusionment with regard to institutions, begins to achieve power that can result from active participation in these political processes.
In addition, the repercussions of the security situation go far beyond the Congolese borders. The economies of Central Africa, especially those of the Republic of Rwanda and Uganda, are intrinsically linked to the stability of the DRC. The possibility of seeing the Congolese government acquiring internal audit mechanisms could encourage other nations in the region to follow this path, thus strengthening regional cooperation on security issues.
### to renewed support for diplomacy
In parallel, this commission plays a crucial role in diplomatic efforts. The hearing of government members can also strengthen the legitimacy of Congolese claims on the international scene and provide a platform for parliamentary diplomacy. This dialogue could open up spaces of cooperation between the DRC and other states, as well as international organizations, to meet the deep causes of the conflict.
### Conclusion: A call for action and commitment
In short, these February 27 auditions mark a crucial step, not only for security in the DRC, but also for the affirmation of a democratic culture which advocates transparency and responsibility. The elements of statistics on the number of displaced people or the human losses due to the conflict make the situation even more urgent. By wishing a period of 48 hours to answer questions, members of the government show recognition of the seriousness of the concerns raised, but this must be accompanied by a serious commitment to act.
It turns out now that these hearings are distributed in a broader framework, the Congolese people deserving clear responses and concrete actions to find peace and security. The real question remains: will elected officials and leaders be up to expectations placed in them by Congolese citizens? This is the challenge that is looming on the horizon, and responsibility is based on the shoulders of each actor involved in this urgent quest for peace.