The Mwant Jet affair continues to generate much ink and provoke strong reactions in political and legal circles in Kinshasa. Recent revelations concerning a complaint filed by associate Gueda Wicht Amani against key members of the airline raise many questions about the role of the Kinshasa/Matete General Prosecutor’s Office in this affair.
According to reliable sources, this complaint aims to accuse Mwant Jet actors of hijacking, rebellion and usurpation of powers. It is important to note that Gueda Wicht Amani is also a shareholder of the company, which adds a complex dimension to this affair.
The objective pursued by the author of the complaint seems to be to weaken the company and slow down its recovery efforts, carried out without her participation. It is interesting to note that Gueda Wicht had already tried twice to dissolve the company, without success. This new move appears to be an attempt to circumvent past failures and find support within the Prosecutor General’s Office.
The alleged modus operandi of this maneuver is quite simple, but worrying. By filing a fanciful complaint, the Prosecutor’s Office could immediately issue wanted notices or arrest warrants against members of the Mwant Jet team, without giving them the opportunity to defend themselves beforehand. This strategy could lead to the arrest and preventive detention of these individuals, which would put the company in a delicate situation.
It is legitimate to wonder whether justice is truly impartial in this case. Partner Gueda Wicht Amani seems to be orchestrating a maneuver to regain control of Mwant Jet, despite the efforts of the Provisional Administrator and partner Michaël Yav to turn the company around. Gueda Wicht’s intentions to make the company disappear cast doubt on his real motivations.
The legitimacy of Gueda Wicht’s installation at the head of the company, based on contested court rulings, raises questions about the integrity of the judicial system involved in this case. The alleged complicity of certain authorities with the partner Gueda Wicht highlights the possible dysfunctions and failings within the judicial system.
In conclusion, it is essential that the competent authorities, in particular the Minister of Justice, take measures to ensure fairness and transparency in the handling of this case. The economic and legal issues related to Mwant Jet require an adequate response to preserve the integrity of justice and protect the interests of the parties involved.