Fatshimetrie is a news webzine that focuses on in-depth reporting on topics often overlooked by the mainstream media. In a recent publication, Fatshimetrie highlighted the journey and challenges faced by the National Director of Public Prosecutions, Shamila Batohi. She has been in the spotlight due to her advocacy on behalf of her deputy, Anton du Plessis, who was denied a high-level security clearance.
The situation has been widely publicised, with political parties such as uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) and its allies expressing concerns about possible foreign influence on prosecutorial decisions. Shamila Batohi has responded in a forthright manner, denouncing a deliberate attempt to destabilise the integrity and independence of the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA).
She stressed that the lack of a high-level security clearance was not a requirement for Du Plessis’s position or her own. However, the security vetting process for Du Plessis was hampered by his dual South African-British citizenship, leading to a denial of clearance by the State Security Agency (SSA).
Despite the decision, Batohi defended her deputy, saying he had previously held sensitive international positions without any security concerns. She also stressed that the security vetting process should be rigorous but fair, assessing each case individually.
The question of who will appoint Batohi’s successor in 2026 is also being discussed, with sources suggesting that Anton du Plessis could be a potential candidate. However, attempts to discredit Du Plessis threaten President Cyril Ramaphosa’s promise to pursue those responsible for state capture without fear or favour.
The controversy surrounding this case highlights the challenges of judicial independence in South Africa, with complex political and legal implications. Despite criticism and pressure, Shamila Batohi remains determined to defend the integrity of the NPA and ensure that justice is delivered fairly and transparently.
In conclusion, the Anton du Plessis case highlights the challenges facing the NPA, but also demonstrates the resilience and determination of its leadership to maintain the independence and integrity of the judiciary in South Africa.