The recent press release issued by Adeniyi reflects a questioning of a report that was published through an online outlet. In this report, allegations of age falsification against Adeniyi were mentioned, suggesting a certain manipulation of the facts.
It is important to emphasize that, according to Adeniyi, these allegations lack credibility and have no solid basis. He even calls them pure disinformation. Indeed, the article in question presents no conclusive evidence to support its claims. No concrete evidence, such as a screenshot of the purported official documents, is provided to support the accusations made against Adeniyi.
In addition, the lack of coherence and logic in the story reported by the online press organization raises legitimate questions. On the one hand, it is claimed that the falsified age would have allowed Adeniyi to extend his service beyond the age limit of 60 years. On the other hand, it is argued that documents would reveal an alteration of the duration of his service in customs. These different elements seem contradictory and cast doubt on the veracity of the information put forward.
It is therefore essential to recall the importance of journalistic rigor and verification of sources before publishing potentially defamatory articles. The responsibility of the media is to provide reliable and verified information, and not to get carried away by the race for sensationalism.
In conclusion, it is necessary to take a step back from such allegations and exercise discernment. It is essential to respect the fundamental principle of the presumption of innocence and not to spread unfounded rumors. The credibility of the media rests on its ability to report facts in an objective and impartial manner, avoiding any sensationalism or bias.