Update from the outgoing Senate office: Refutation of Crefdl’s financial allegations

Update from the outgoing Senate office on the Crefdl financial report

In an already tense political context, the outgoing Senate office was recently faced with controversy following the publication of a Crefdl financial report which accused both houses of Parliament of having received a colossal sum from the public treasury over a period of two years. This information provoked strong reactions and brought discredit to legislative institutions.

However, in a scathing clarification, the coordinator of the Senate communications unit, Gianni-Jimmy Mulumba Mukelenge, vigorously rejected the allegations in the report, calling it “false across the board” and amounting to “malicious manipulation “. According to the outgoing office, the figures put forward are purely fictitious and in no way correspond to the reality of the Senate’s finances.

The arguments put forward by the upper house of Parliament are solid. On the one hand, each chamber of Parliament benefits from financial and administrative autonomy, which excludes any confusion in accounting data. By mixing the figures from the two chambers, the Crefdl report deliberately misleads and damages the reputation of the institutions.

Furthermore, the outgoing Senate office highlights the transparency process that governs its activities. At each session, a financial management report is presented, and no irregularities have been noted so far. The purported suppliers mentioned in the report are described as non-existent, casting doubt on the reliability of the information provided.

The warning issued by the Senate against detractors and malicious politicians is strong, underlining the desire to fight against false accusations and attempts at destabilization. A complaint against unknown person for damaging imputations strengthens the Senate’s determination to defend its integrity and credibility.

In conclusion, this update from the outgoing Senate office highlights the importance of transparency, rigor and accountability in the management of public finances. Despite attempts to discredit it, the institution remains determined to shed light on this affair and to defend its honor in the face of unjustified attacks.

This reaction from the Senate underlines the importance of verifying sources and being cautious about information likely to harm the image of institutions.