The use of incendiary weapons regularly gives rise to debate and controversy during armed conflicts. One of the most well-known of these incendiary weapons is white phosphorus. Recently, the Israeli army was accused by humanitarian organizations of having used white phosphorus during its assault on the Gaza Strip. Although the Israeli army denies these allegations, this case highlights the issues surrounding the use of this incendiary weapon.
What is white phosphorus?
White phosphorus is a flammable substance that reacts on contact with oxygen. It can burn at very high temperatures and for a long period of time. This makes it a formidable weapon on the battlefield, where it is used as a smoke screen to hide troop movements. However, its use in urban areas, such as Gaza, can pose serious problems, as it is difficult to control damage and distinguish between military targets and civilian populations.
The devastating consequences of white phosphorus
The effects of white phosphorus on humans are devastating. The burns it causes can reach the bones, and its smoke is corrosive, causing burns to the eyes and skin. Additionally, white phosphorus is soluble in human flesh, which can lead to serious internal damage. Scientists estimate that burns covering just 10% of the human body can be fatal.
The legal framework surrounding the use of white phosphorus
The use of white phosphorus is regulated by international humanitarian law. According to the Geneva Conventions, the use of this weapon is prohibited in areas populated by civilians. However, it is important to note that its use against military targets is not prohibited per se.
The debate around the use of white phosphorus
The case of the Israeli army being accused of using white phosphorus in Gaza raises important questions about the legitimacy and ethics of the use of this weapon. NGOs, such as Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International, strongly condemn its use because of the suffering it inflicts on civilians.
However, it is essential to note that this matter is not limited to Israel alone. The use of white phosphorus has been reported in other conflicts, such as the war in Ukraine. It is therefore crucial to look at the issue as a whole and think about solutions to limit the use of this weapon in armed conflicts.
In conclusion, the use of white phosphorus as an incendiary weapon raises serious concerns in the international community. The devastating consequences of this weapon on civilian populations reinforce the need for a clear legal framework and more in-depth reflection on the use of such weapons during armed conflicts.