What conclusions can we draw from the constitutional referendum of July 30 in the Central African Republic? What consequences for the power of Faustin Archange Touadéra and for the opposition? What is the attitude of the international community towards this election? In this article, we will try to answer these questions by analyzing the results of the referendum and their implications.
On July 30, the constitutional referendum was held in the Central African Republic and the “yes” vote won with 95.27% of the vote. However, the main opposition groups boycotted the poll, thus questioning the legitimacy of these results. In addition, testimonies point to poorly attended polling stations, which raises doubts as to the announced turnout.
By granting extended powers to President Touadéra, this referendum paves the way for a possible candidacy for a third term in 2025. Indeed, with the new Constitution, the President has more leeway to consolidate his power and appoint more members of the Constitutional Court. This would allow him to represent himself without obstacles.
The choice of a vice-president is also crucial in this context. Several names have been mentioned, such as Évariste Ngamana and Simplice Mathieu Sarandji, who are both close to President Touadéra. This choice will reveal the alliances and the balance of power within the Central African power.
On the opposition side, the contestation of the results of the referendum underlines its weakness and its division. Some opponents have even called for taking up arms against President Touadéra, while others are trying to remain within the democratic field despite the lack of space to assert their voices.
Regarding the reaction of the international community, there is virtual silence around this vote. This silence can be explained by a prioritization of objectives aimed at weakening Russian influence in the Central African Republic, to the detriment of the fight for democracy and electoral transparency.
In conclusion, the constitutional referendum in the Central African Republic raises many uncertainties and controversies. The high numbers in favor of the “yes” vote raise questions about the legitimacy and transparency of the electoral process. The consequences of this vote are felt on the power of President Touadéra and on the opposition, which is weakened. As for the international community, its silence calls into question its priorities in terms of democracy and respect for human rights. It remains to be seen how the politico-institutional future of the Central African Republic will take shape following this referendum