Why does the military operation in Jenin illustrate the escalation of the conflict in the West Bank?

### State of play in the West Bank: The spiral of an eternal conflict

The recent Israeli military operation in Jenin, in the heart of the West Bank, underscores the intensification of tensions often overshadowed by events in Gaza. As Israel targets infrastructure it considers terrorist, the landscape becomes one of a forgotten struggle, marked by increasing violence. In 2022, nearly 250 Palestinians have been killed, while unemployment is reaching devastating heights, exacerbating despair among the youth. This duality between conflict zones and moments of truce raises the question of the future of the region, where the absence of constructive dialogue and ambivalent international support suggest an ever darker sky. The future of the Palestinian people and the quest for peace depend on genuine initiatives of appeasement, without which the spiral of violence risks becoming a tragic constant.

Why did Martin Fayulu cancel his February 1st march: act of responsibility or political calculation?

**The Suspension of Martin Fayulu’s March: Between Responsibility and Political Calculation**

On February 1, 2025, Martin Fayulu made an unexpected decision by canceling a march planned in Kinshasa, which was supposed to denounce Rwandan aggression in eastern DRC and support the FARDC. This cancellation comes in a context of growing tensions and violence linked to recent demonstrations. Fayulu, while calling for national cohesion, questions the risks of escalating violence, which raises the question: is this an act of responsibility or a political maneuver? As the opposition navigates between the demand for action and the desire to preserve its image, other forms of mobilization, such as digital campaigns, are emerging as peaceful alternatives. In short, this decision could mark a turning point in Congolese political dynamics, where the need for unity in the face of external threats is accompanied by a call for responsibility and innovation in citizen mobilization.

Why did Martin Fayulu choose to cancel his February 1 march and what impact will this have on the socio-political dynamics in the DRC?

### The Cancellation of Martin Fayulu’s March: An Act of Responsibility

The announcement of the cancellation of Martin Fayulu’s popular march, scheduled for February 1, raises questions about the socio-political dynamics in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Due to rising tensions due to Rwandan aggression, Fayulu chose to suspend this event, placing the preservation of peace before immediate political aspirations. This act, far from being a capitulation, demonstrates a sincere desire to foster national cohesion in a country already tested by conflicts.

Far from a simple cancellation, Fayulu calls for the unity of the Congolese, emphasizing the need to mobilize around common projects in the face of identity and economic challenges. His decision also questions political mobilization strategies, suggesting that the transition to digital methods and transpartisan coalitions could be the key to bringing together a population in search of change. By advocating peace while recognizing the role of the army, Fayulu is embarking on a difficult but crucial path for the future of the DRC, recalling that politics should be a space of hope and solidarity.

Why does the Arzé massacre highlight the urgency of an inclusive dialogue in Syria?

**Syria: Shadows of sectarian rivalries deepen after Arze massacre**

On February 1, the village of Arze, Syria, was the scene of a tragic and disturbing massacre, with the death of at least ten civilians, including a child and an elderly woman. This attack, targeting the Alawite community, highlights the deep and deadly fractures that the conflict is exacerbating in Syrian society, already consumed by sectarian tensions. While the promises of the new authorities to respect the rights of minorities are often questioned, the international community plays a crucial role in the quest for genuine peace. The need for inclusive dialogue and reconciliation initiatives then becomes a priority to build bridges and stop the spiral of violence that threatens the fragile social fabric of the country. The tragedy of Arze must not only be a reminder of past suffering but a call for collective responsibility to avoid future atrocities.

Why does the cancellation of Tshisekedi’s commemoration reveal the tensions between collective memory and the humanitarian crisis in the DRC?

**Commemoration cancelled: When Tshisekedi’s memory collides with contemporary realities in the DRC**

On February 1, 2025, the Democratic Republic of Congo was to commemorate the eighth anniversary of the death of Étienne Tshisekedi, a symbol of the struggle for democracy. However, this ceremony was cancelled, marking a desire for meditation in the face of the serious humanitarian crisis in the east of the country, where M23 violence and Rwandan incursions continue to destabilize populations. This decision highlights the poignant dilemma of collective memory: can it thrive in chaos? As Tshisekedi’s legacy seems unclear in the current geopolitical context, it becomes crucial to transform this moment of reflection into concrete actions, in order to confront persistent injustices and redefine the country with its democratic ideals at heart. By truly honoring his memory, the DRC could revive the aspirations for peace and unity so desired by its people.

Why did Martin Fayulu choose to suspend the February 1, 2020 march in the DRC and what are the implications for the opposition and national cohesion?

**Suspending Anger: Martin Fayulu on the Challenges of Political Mobilization in the DRC**

Amid political tensions in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Martin Fayulu, leader of the Ecidé, made the controversial decision to suspend a march planned for February 1, 2020, a move seen by some as an act of caution in the face of past violence. While this suspension may foster national cohesion, it raises important questions about the opposition’s ability to unite people around a common project, without falling into a form of passivity. As the DRC enters a pivotal period and aspirations for change remain strong, Fayulu and other opposition leaders must consider new strategies for mobilization that go beyond protests, while taking into account international influences. This critical moment could thus serve as a catalyst for a reassessment of the methods of political struggle and a democratic renewal in the DRC. The road is strewn with pitfalls, but dialogue and collaboration seem to be the keys to a serene and sustainable political future.

How can Giorgia Meloni reconcile strict migration policies and respect for human rights in Italy?

**Giorgia Meloni: Between migration issues and legal challenges in Italy**

The management of migration flows in Italy, under the leadership of Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, is entering a crucial phase with the arrival of a boat carrying 43 migrants from Albania. Her strategy, aimed at outsourcing the processing of asylum applications, is facing legal setbacks. While Italy is opting for restrictive policies, other European countries, such as Germany and France, are choosing more integrative approaches. With a 30% increase in migrant arrivals in 2023, and the potential economic contributions of refugees to the key, the question arises: will Italy be able to reconcile security and human rights? With a crucial hearing at the European Court of Justice approaching, time is running out for a change of course that could determine the migratory future of the country and Europe.

Why could the “dead city” day in Bandundu redefine youth engagement in the FARDC?

### Bandundu: The “dead city” as a call for national unity

On February 1, the city of Bandundu will be the scene of a bold initiative, the “dead city”, launched by Mayor Moïse Monshengo Nzeme. This movement aims to encourage a peaceful mobilization of the population, while raising crucial questions about the enlistment of young people in the Armed Forces of the Democratic Republic of Congo (FARDC). In the midst of an uncertain socio-political context, this symbolic approach recalls past struggles for civil rights and could open a path towards civic renewal and better representation.

However, the success of this mobilization will depend on a synergy between the different local actors: civil society, religious institutions, political parties and security forces. By engaging young people not only as recruits, but also as partners in the development of the military, Bandundu is preparing for a day that could redefine the social and political dynamics of the region, while laying the foundations for a constructive dialogue for the future of the nation.

Why does the Lumba attack reveal the urgent need to rethink security in the DRC?

**Lumba Tragedy: The Essential Reflection on Security in the DRC**

On January 31, 2023, the Lumba region of the Democratic Republic of Congo was hit by a bloody attack by the Allied Democratic Forces (ADF), bringing the civilian death toll to twelve, according to civil society. As impunity for armed groups intensifies, the state’s ability to protect its citizens is now being called into question. Recent statistics reveal an alarming increase in violence in the east of the country, while civil society is urging the strengthening of the national military forces’ positions in the face of this growing threat. In parallel, civic engagement is emerging as a key lever to mobilize public opinion and encourage comprehensive actions, integrating not only military solutions, but also development and reconciliation initiatives. The situation underlines the urgency of a concerted approach, which addresses both the symptoms and the root causes of this persistent violence, to build a secure and dignified future for all Congolese.

How are the accusations of the Deputy Minister of the Interior worsening the crisis of confidence in the DRC?

**DRC on the Brink of Crisis: The Controversial Statement by the Deputy Minister of the Interior**

The statements of the Deputy Minister of the Interior, Mrs. Tshela, attributing the recent acts of violence in the Democratic Republic of Congo to “fake infiltrated demonstrators” supported by Rwandan agents, reveal the government’s fragile management of crises. By relying on accusatory rhetoric, Tshela diverts attention from the deep social and political fractures that are shaking the country. This tendency to designate a common enemy, often foreign, is a classic tactic of regimes in difficulty to maintain control in the face of growing dissent.

While the population aspires to real representation, demagogic speeches and the climate of mistrust fuel a cycle of violence and impunity. The Forces of Progress, a militia associated with the presidential party, illustrate this worrying spiral, intervening without real supervision.

To foster a peaceful future, it is crucial to promote inclusive dialogue mechanisms and elevate the voices of civil society. The DRC must reexamine its political narratives if it hopes to restore trust and build a more united society, where the quest for truth prevails over cynicism.