
During a hearing before the High Military Court, the lawyers of Édouard Mwangachuchu, a deputy prosecuted for treason and alleged links with the M23 rebels, decided to withdraw. This decision provoked strong reactions from lawyers, who denounce a lack of listening and humanism on the part of the High Military Court. This article examines the potential consequences of this withdrawal on the course of the trial of Édouard Mwangachuchu, particularly in terms of fairness and respect for the rights of the accused. The appointment of a court-appointed lawyer raises questions about the defendant’s adequate defense and the extension of his pre-trial detention. It is essential that the military court act with responsibility and guarantee a fair trial, respectful of the fundamental rights of Édouard Mwangachuchu.