The question of abortion in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) is at the crossroads of national legal standards and international commitments, such as the Maputo protocol, ratified in 2018 by the country. This protocol aims to protect the rights of women, in particular the right to a secure abortion in certain circumstances. However, its implementation comes up against a national legal framework which considers abortion as a crime, generating insecurity both for women and health professionals. The training and awareness of law actors, in particular through initiatives by organizations such as Ipas, try to clarify these issues and initiate a reform that is not limited to legislative texts, but also takes into account socio -cultural realities. This dynamic raises questions about the possibility of building a legal environment that is in line with human rights and the needs of Congolese women, while respecting the cultural and social norms in force.
Category: Legal
As part of a disturbing investigation into the murder of Jonathan Mazaza Tshona, which occurred on April 1, 2025 in Kinshasa, are taking shape both legal and societal. The discovery of the body of this 42-year-old man in his garage sparked a series of events that question not only the administration of justice in the Democratic Republic of Congo, but also the social issues that underlie violence in often marginalized communities. The circumstances of his death and the presence of a young man, Bondeke Ndongete, near the place of the incident raise complex questions. Through this tragedy, an opportunity emerges from exploring the challenges of a legal system still changing, while considering the human and social consequences that result from it. A collective reflection is then imposed on the way in which society can respond to violence and injustices, while promoting approaches to rehabilitation rather than only repression.
The Commission of Inquiry of the National Assembly of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) is closely interested in recruitment and promotion practices within the Court of Auditors, a subject which raises essential questions on transparency and good governance in the country. In a context marked by increasing concerns concerning corruption and favoritism, this survey aims to examine how human resources are managed in this key institution, whose integrity is crucial to establish the confidence of citizens in the use of public funds. The president of the commission, Paul Gaspard Ngondankoy Nkoy Ea Loonga, calls for a clarification of the processes in place, while being aware that internal resistances could hinder this approach. This survey is not limited to internal dysfunctions, but also raises wider questions about governance, citizen engagement and the necessary reforms. It thus represents an opportunity for collective reflection on the future of the Court of Auditors and on the means of strengthening its legitimacy within Congolese state architecture.
The Bukanga Lonzo affair, which involves former Congolese Prime Minister Matata Ponyo as well as other co -accused, recently captured attention to Kinshasa, revealing crucial judicial and political issues for the future of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). While the Constitutional Court is preparing to make its verdict, the accusations against these political figures raise questions around the impartiality of justice and the role of institutions in a climate of persistent political tensions. In a context where the separation of powers is put to the test, the reaction of the National Assembly in the face of these prosecution, as well as the efforts to modernize the administration, reflect complex dynamics which deserve special attention. This set of events invites us to reflect on the rule of law and governance, while emphasizing the need for open and constructive dialogue to strengthen the country’s democratic foundations.
In the complex and often tragic context of North Kivu in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the looping operation carried out by the AFC-M23 rebels in Goma raises crucial issues related to human security and rights. While the region faces increasing insecurity, characterized by violent acts such as assassinations and kidnappings, AFC-M23 defends this operation as a necessary response to restore order. However, the methods used, in particular arrests suspected of being arbitrary, arouse legitimate concerns about the legitimacy of its action. This scenario highlights the delicate balance between the need to guarantee security within the population and respect for fundamental rights, thus questioning the approaches adopted to meet deeply rooted challenges. The situation calls for a constructive and inclusive dialogue to consider sustainable solutions, which integrate both the security imperatives and the rights of individuals.
The recent return of a collection of 25 Egyptian artefacts, recovered in New York, highlights a complex problem which relates both to the preservation of the cultural heritage and to the legal questions linked to the trafficking of antiquities. This initiative of the Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, although welcomed as a significant advance, also raises questions about the ethical and practical issues associated with the management of cultural goods in an international context. The existence of organized networks facilitating the illegal trade of ancient objects calls for a deeper reflection on collective responsibility in the preservation of the historical heritage of nations. Beyond the restitution of the artefacts, this situation opens up a debate on the means of ensuring a respectful and enlightened sharing of history, while sensitizing the invaluable value of these witnesses of the past.
The Gérard Depardieu affair, recently judged due to alleged sexual assault on two women during a shoot, raises both legal and societal issues. Available and sentenced to 18 months suspended prison sentence, the actor has already announced his intention to appeal. This verdict is part of a context where sexual violence is at the heart of public debates, particularly following the #MeToo movement, and offers an opportunity to reflect on the balance to be found between the protection of victims and respect for the rights of the accused. The various reactions of public opinion reveal the existing tensions around these delicate issues, while the career of this emblematic artist could be marked by this new reality. This event invites us to examine not only the question of justice, but also our expectations in terms of social behavior and individual responsibility in the artistic field.
The recent appointment of Christophe Bitasimwa Bahi at the head of the General Inspectorate of Finance (IGF) in the Democratic Republic of Congo raises questions about the future of this institution in a context where the fight against corruption and public finance management are at the heart of national concerns. Succeeding Jules Allégete, whose mandate was marked by advances in transparency but also criticisms of the independence of investigations, Bahi and his team are in front of complex issues. The need to strengthen this independence, increase citizen engagement and optimize the Human and Material Resources of the IGF appear as decisive challenges to build more effective financial governance. While the economic and political landscape is evolving, the way in which these issues will be discussed could well shape the evolution of the institution and its impact on Congolese society.
The Idriss Youssouf Boy case, former chief of staff to Chadian President Mahamat Idris Déby Itno, raises crucial questions about governance and the judicial system in Chad. Incarcerated since January 2025, Boy is faced with accusations of embezzlement of funds emanating from an entrepreneur, highlighting much broader issues than the simple legal context. This situation takes place in a tense political and economic climate, where transparency and responsibility in the management of public contracts are often questioned. By leaning on this case, we are led to reflect on the functioning of Chadian institutions, the quest for truth and the way in which the country could evolve towards more ethical and just governance. This emblematic case thus calls for a careful examination of the relations between power, justice and civil society, and highlights the importance of preserving the confidence of citizens in their institutions.
The Ibrahima Chérif Bah trial, former director of the Guinean central bank, recently sentenced to five years in prison for accusations of embezzlement and corruption, is part of a complex political and judicial landscape in Guinea. This case, which took place in a context of exile of the accused and increasing political tension, raises essential questions on the relationship between justice and political issues in a country where confidence in institutions is already put to the test. The implications of this verdict go beyond the individual case, relating to broader concerns concerning governance, the fight against corruption and civil rights. By examining both public reactions and systemic issues, this analysis invites you to reflect on the future of justice and democracy in Guinea.