The recognition of the massacres of May 8, 1945 in Algeria raises issues of memory and reconciliation between France and its former colony.

On May 8, 1945 marked both a celebration of victory over Nazism for France and a tragic episode of Algerian history, where independence demonstrations were violently repressed, leading to the death of thousands of people. While this event has long been overshadowed by other national stories, it returns to public debate through the call of a collective of researchers and historians for official recognition of these massacres. This subject raises complex questions about collective memory, the reconciliation of identities and the colonial heritage which continues to shape relations between France and Algeria. The difficulty of admitting a conflicting past and persistent resentments in France vis-à-vis populations of Algerian origin add a delicate dimension to this quest for truth. In this context, the reflection on the recognition of the suffering suffering could open ways of dialogue and reconciliation, both institutionally and socially.

The tensions between Ukraine and Russia are reviving each other as May 9, making dialogue for peace increasingly complex.

As May 9, which occupy a central place in the Russian collective memory, approaching the Dialogue between the Ukrainian Presidents Volodymyr Zelensky and Russian Vladimir Putin reflects persistent tensions between their nations. Reciprocal declarations reveal not only historical misunderstandings, but also a rooted distrust which complicates the perspectives of peace. While Zelensky deciphers Putin’s proposals as a manipulative strategy, Russia accuses Ukraine of constituting a threat to its symbolic celebrations. This double discourse highlights the challenges of a constructive dialogue in a context where historical narrations oppose and where the path to a mutual understanding seems sown with pitfalls. Thus, the question arises: how to approach this complexity to promote lasting reconciliation, while respecting the distinct memories of the two countries?

Elara Bertho explores the central role of Conakry in Pan -Africanism through the story of Miriam Makeba and Stokely Carmichael.

In a world where debates on identity and history are gaining momentum, Elara Bertho’s work, “A Pan -African couple: Miriam Makeba and Stokely Carmichael in Guinea”, offers a rich and nuanced perspective on Pan -Africanism through the prism of two emblematic figures. Stokely Carmichael, African-American activist engaged in civil rights, and Miriam Makeba, singer and symbol of anti-apartheid struggle, chose to settle in Guinea in the late 1960s, a country then perceived as a refuge for African and African-descendants militants. This book is not content to narrate their personal history, but also questions the role of Conakry in the Pan -African story, often overshadowed by other major cities. By enlightening these themes, Bertho poses questions about collective identity, the struggles for freedom and inclusiveness in contemporary Pan -Africanism, thus inviting in -depth reflection on the inheritance left by these historical commitments.

Recognition of women’s contributions in resistance during the Second World War as a crucial issue for history and gender issues.

The end of the Second World War in May 1945 not only marked a historic turning point, but also an opportunity to revisit often neglected stories, especially those of women engaged in resistance. Despite the decisive role of around 26,000 women, whose contributions have often been darken by more publicized male figures, their history deserves renewed attention. The testimonies of survivors, enriched by contemporary research, reveal complex dynamics, such as sorority and mutual support, which have played an essential role in concentration camps. By reassessing female commitment during this period, we have the opportunity not only to honor their bravery, but also to reflect on social constructions that have long obscured the importance of their participation. In doing so, we lay the foundations for a better understanding of gender issues in the struggles for justice, both in the past and in our current era.

Russia intensifies its propaganda when approaching victory day, integrating contemporary issues in the memory of the Second World War.

As May 9 approaches, Russia is preparing to celebrate the day of victory, an emblematic date that commemorates the capitulation of Nazi Germany in 1945. This celebration, deeply rooted in the Russian collective imagination, has particular issues in the current context, marked by the conflict in Ukraine. The Vladimir Putin regime uses this opportunity to strengthen a national story linked to the memory of the Second World War, by integrating elements of contemporary struggle. This phenomenon raises questions about history management and its use for political purposes, while arousing strong concerns internationally. In this context, the celebrations of May 9 become not only a tool for legitimizing the present, but also a mirror of socio -political tensions and future challenges in dialogue and understanding between nations.

Vietnam commemorates the fiftieth anniversary of the fall of Saigon in the midst of renewed interior challenges and geopolitical dynamics.

In April 2025, Vietnam will mark the fiftieth anniversary of the fall of Saigon, a historic event that ended years of conflict and sealed the country’s reunification under the communist regime. This commemoration has a particular meaning, in particular by the unprecedented presence of Chinese soldiers, which raises questions about complex and sometimes conflicting relations between these two neighboring nations. While Vietnam has experienced significant economic transformations since the reforms of “ổi Mới”, it is also faced with challenges in terms of human rights and civil freedoms. In addition, the geopolitical dynamic, amplified by the rapprochement with the United States, invites us to reflect on the way in which Vietnam will sail between the influences of the great powers while preserving its national identity. On the occasion of this anniversary, it is thus a question of questioning not only the past, but also the prospects of a peaceful and cooperative future, by mixing collective memories and common aspirations.

The death of Pope Francis opens a new era for the Catholic Church, highlighting the challenges and expectations in the face of his succession.

The death of Pope Francis, which occurred on Easter Monday 2025, leaves the Catholic Church to a crucial turning point in its history, while inviting a deep reflection on its heritage and the future direction of this millennial institution. His funerality, which brought together more than 400,000 people at the Sainte-Marie-Majeure basilica, was a moment of meditation and emotion, testifying to his influence on generations of Catholics around the world. While his innovative approach and his reforms have marked a turning point towards a more open church, the question of the continuity of this inheritance arises acutely for the imminent conclave. Will the choices of cardinals meet the expectations of a community in search of inclusiveness and commitment to contemporary challenges? Beyond this transition, the implications of this moment could resonate far beyond the Vatican, shaping the identity and the role of the Church in today’s society.

Boston honors the legacy of the struggles for civil rights and addresses the contemporary challenges of inclusion and social justice.

The rally planned in Boston in tribute to Martin Luther King Jr. represents a significant opportunity to reflect on the legacy of the struggles for civil rights, while highlighting contemporary issues that persist, such as access to education, employment and fair housing. If this event celebrates a key moment in history, it also invites us to question the progress made, but also about the challenges that remain in the current context, marked by policies that question the efforts in favor of diversity and inclusion. Through the speeches and exchanges that will occur there, a path of constructive dialogue and collective responsibility will be sketched, allowing to explore how citizen engagement can nourish reflections on social justice and equity. This gathering thus embodies a living past and an opportunity to build a future inclusive in a climate of tensions and questions.

Ten years after the 2015 earthquake, Nepal seeks to build a more resilient and sustainable future.

Nepal is at a crossroads in its history, a decade after the devastating earthquake of April 25, 2015 which caused immense human losses and considerable damage to infrastructure and cultural sites. This country, already vulnerable to natural disasters, strives to sail through the complex challenges of reconstruction and resilience. While efforts to restore buildings and strengthen security intensifies, various issues arise around resource management, transparency of international aid and the involvement of local communities. This context raises reflections on the possible ways for sustainable and inclusive development, where Nepal could not only get up but also serve as an example for other nations faced with similar challenges. Throughout this exploration, it is interesting to consider how the country articulates its past with its future aspirations, always in search of a balance between reconstruction and innovation.

The reopening of the Palais d’Haile Selassié accompanies the publication of a work re -examining his heritage in Ethiopia.

On December 29, 2024, Addis Ababa celebrated the reopening of an emblematic monument of his imperial past: the Palais d’Haile Selassié, the last Ethiopia emperor. This event was accompanied by the publication of a work, ** Haile Selassié, the photo albums of the Palais **, which offers a questioning of the complex image of this man, both admired and criticized. Through the eyes of the historian Shiferaw Bekele, the public and private photographs of the emperor offer a more human perspective, while raising the question of the rehabilitation of his memory. However, this return to his inheritance is not without controversy. While some see him as a symbol of modernity and education, others recall the excesses of a reign tainted by authoritarianism. This debate not only questions the look at the Ethiopian past, but also its influence in the quest for a contemporary national identity. In this delicate context, Ethiopians are called upon to navigate between collective memory and aspirations of the future, in a nuanced reflection on their history.