In the dynamic world of news, it can happen that journalists find themselves at the heart of controversies and legal proceedings. This is the case in Burkina Faso, where two journalists were recently convicted of defamation following the publication of an article implicating the current Minister of the Economy and the directors general of taxes and customs.
It all started with an article published in the investigative newspaper Le Reporter in June 2023, which highlighted irregularities in a transaction involving the mining company IAMGOLD Essakane. According to the journalist, the directors general of customs and taxes as well as the Minister of the Economy caused a significant loss of several billion CFA francs to the State. These allegations are based on non-compliance with the ECOWAS and UEMOA customs code, which allegedly led to poor management of the transaction.
At trial, the defendants stood by their claims, stating that the money had not been paid at the time the article was published. However, the plaintiffs’ lawyers produced a document proving the opposite, thus calling into question the credibility of the journalists.
Ultimately, both journalists were found guilty of defamation and aiding and abetting defamation. They were sentenced to a suspended fine of one million CFA francs (approximately 1,520 euros) and will also have to pay a sum of 500,000 CFA francs (approximately 760 euros) to each complainant in damages.
This case raises questions about press freedom in Burkina Faso and the protection of journalists. Some believe that the conviction of journalists could create a climate of fear and self-censorship within the profession.
Importantly, journalists have expressed their intention to appeal the decision, hoping to be able to make their case and defend their crucial role in society as gatekeepers of information.
The case also raises the issue of transparency in transactions involving mining companies, an area often prone to controversy and irregularities. It is essential that the media play its counter-power role by investigating and exposing such matters, in the interest of society and good governance.
In conclusion, this defamation case in Burkina Faso highlights the challenges that journalists can face in the exercise of their profession. It also raises questions about press freedom and transparency in the field of mining transactions. It is crucial to protect and support the work of journalists to ensure free access to information and accountability of those in power.