Title: “Contradictions in the ARMP recruitment process: ODEP sounds the alarm”
Introduction :
The recruitment process for the positions of Director General and Deputy Director General of the Public Procurement Regulatory Authority (ARMP) has attracted strong criticism. The Public Expenditure Observatory (ODEP) denounces the contradictions between the call for applications and the terms of reference. According to this civil society organization, these contradictions compromise the integrity of the recruitment process and favor political predators to the detriment of competent technocrats. In this article, we take a closer look at this worrying situation and its implications for public governance.
Contested recruitment criteria:
According to the ODEP, the recruitment criteria set in the call for applications notice go against the provisions of the Decree establishing the creation, organization and operation of the ARMP. While article 24 of the said decree emphasizes moral integrity, technical qualification and professional experience in the legal, technical, economic or public procurement management fields, the call for applications notice is focuses more on academic qualification and relevant professional experience.
ODEP sees in these criteria an imbalance which risks favoring politically influential candidates to the detriment of the technical skills necessary for this key position within the ARMP. This situation compromises the vocation of this public establishment dedicated to good governance and the transparent management of public funds.
Contested composition of the ad hoc commission:
ODEP also raises concerns regarding the composition of the ad hoc committee responsible for the recruitment process. According to her, the members of this commission do not have the necessary prerequisites in terms of public procurement. Thus, ODEP calls on the Chairman of the ARMP Board of Directors to surround himself with recognized specialists in public procurement in order to ensure an impartial and skills-based recruitment process.
The importance of transparency in recruitment:
This case once again highlights the importance of transparency and integrity in recruitment processes within public institutions. To ensure effective management of public procurement and protection of public funds, it is essential to prioritize technical skills and relevant experience rather than political connections or personal interests.
Conclusion :
ODEP highlights major contradictions in the ARMP recruitment process, thus compromising its crucial role in the regulation of public markets and good governance of public funds. It is essential to rectify these shortcomings and ensure a transparent recruitment process, based on technical skills and moral integrity. Civil society and committed stakeholders must remain vigilant to preserve the principles of transparency and accountability in the management of public institutions.