The reopening of the mixed commission on the scattered islands relaunches the dialogue between Madagascar and France on the question of sovereignty.

The reopening of the mixed commission on the scattered islands, scheduled for June 30 in Paris, marks a crucial moment in relations between Madagascar and France. Twenty years after the last meeting on this complex subject, this initiative comes in a geopolitical and environmental context in full evolution, revealing the strategic interests of the two countries. At the heart of the debates is the question of sovereignty over these islands, claimed by Madagascar since the 1970s, while being widely disputed by France. The reactions within the Malagasy government oscillate between the wish to establish a constructive dialogue and reservations issued by the opposition on resource management. This process could thus open ways towards cooperation more respectful of mutual interests, but it also raises questions about how to reconcile Malagasy aspirations with colonial heritage and current realities. The historical scope of this meeting calls for a nuanced reflection on bilateral relations and their common future in the face of contemporary challenges.
### Removal of the mixed commission on the scattered islands: issues and perspectives between Madagascar and France

The decision of Emmanuel Macron and Andry Rajoelina to convene the mixed commission on the scattered islands represents a potential turning point in Franco-Malgache relations. This meeting, scheduled for June 30 in Paris, comes six years after the last meeting on this thorny subject. At a time when geopolitical, economic and environmental issues are complicated in the region, this initiative could mark the beginning of a renewed dialogue, but it must also be apprehended with prudence and discernment.

#### A loaded historical context

The scattered islands, located in the Mozambique canal, are at the heart of a long -standing dispute between Madagascar and France. Since the 1970s, Madagascar has claimed sovereignty over these islands. This request was also supported by resolutions of the United Nations General Assembly, which called on France to start negotiations. The Malagasy president reaffirmed these historic rights during official visits, insisting on the Malagasy nature of the islands. However, President Macron clearly expressed that France would not provide for transfer of sovereignty, favoring cooperation in the form of co -management instead.

### Reactions from government and opposition

Malagasy Minister of Foreign Affairs Rasata Rafaravavitafika welcomed this meeting as an advance to install a fruitful dialogue, while remaining firm on the historical rights of her country. This position illustrates a desire to negotiate in a framework that respects the interests of Madagascar, while recognizing the political and economic realities at stake.

However, the Malagasy opposition, notably represented by Hajo Andrianainarivelo from the MMM party, expressed reservations about this approach. Does the request for a transfer of sovereignty before discussing a co-management raises important questions: how far can Madagascar go into this negotiation without compromising the legitimacy of its historical claim? The concerns of opponents, who fear short -view management of potential resources associated with the scattered islands, also deserve to be taken into account.

#### A question of sovereignty in the face of geopolitics

French repositioning in the Indian Ocean, symbolized by this meeting, must also be analyzed in the light of regional geopolitical issues. With neighboring countries like Mauritius and the Comoros which also claim territories, the situation is all the more complex. France, which controls about half of the Mozambique canal, must take into account not only its relationship with Madagascar, but also regional dynamics. The fishery and gas resources present in this area are of an increasing strategic interest in the riparian nations.

#### Reflections on a shared future

The revival of the mixed commission opens the way to discussions which, hopefully, will allow us to find common ground. This could require difficult compromises, but the displayed will of the two parties to start talks is a positive sign. Co -management, although rejected by some, could offer a cooperation model more respectful of mutual interests, provided that it is conceived in a transparent and equitable manner.

The question remains: how to establish a constructive dialogue which respects the aspirations of Madagascar while taking into account the colonial heritage and the current political realities? The construction of relationships based on trust, mutual respect and strategic intelligence will be essential to the success of this way of dialogue.

Faced with the challenges posed by climate change and economic inequalities, it is also crucial that discussions are accompanied by a broader reflection on sustainability and management of maritime resources. The two countries could explore innovative solutions to jointly develop economic potential in the region while preserving its ecosystem.

#### Conclusion

The meeting scheduled for June 30 represents a historic opportunity for Madagascar and France to redefine their relationship around the scattered islands. This will require the efforts of both parties to establish a constructive and respectful dialogue, paving the way for a shared future. As this meeting approaches, it is crucial to remain attentive to the voices of the Malagasy, both in government and in opposition, so that their concerns and aspirations are heard and taken into account in this delicate process.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *