** The evolution of the situation in Sudan: between political declarations and tragic realities **
On April 15, 2023, Sudan experienced a brutal climbing of tensions between the Sudanese armed forces (FAS) and the rapid support forces (RSF), a paramilitary group which quickly established itself as a key actor in the conflict. Two years after the start of this armed conflict, the commander of the RSF, Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, known as Hemedti, announced the creation of a “government of peace and unity” during a registered speech. This declaration deserves an in -depth analysis to understand the implications, both political and humanitarian.
### A crucial declaration
Dagalo’s statement comes after two years of devastating violence that cost at least 24,000 people, according to estimates. The situation has worsened to the point that more than 13 million Sudanese have been moved, placing the country in a humanitarian crisis, the consequences of which are felt both inside and outside its borders. While Dagalo claims to establish a government recognized by other factions, including a group of the Sudan Liberation Movement, is it essential to ask: what is the real objective of this announcement? Is it a real hope of peace or an attempt to legitimize a contested power in a context of conflict?
### The context of violence
The rise of RSF coincided with growing allegations of human rights violations. UN reports and human rights organizations document atrocities, including attacks targeting civilian populations in refugee camps. The recent attack on the camps of Zamzam and Abu Shouk, which caused more than 400 people, including humanitarian workers, raises essential questions about civil security and the capacity of international organizations to act in this context of incessant violence.
###
The international recognition of a self -proclaimed government in a context of violent human rights violations poses an ethical dilemma. If Hemedti’s objective is to form an alternative basis of power, will it really promote peace, or does it not risk further strengthening internal divisions? Sudan has a complex history of conflicts, marked by power struggles, ethnic tensions and social injustices. This heritage inevitably influences the perceptions and reactions of the various actors, both national and international.
### Humanitarian consequences
The human cost of this war is not only a figure; It represents broken lives, inappropriate families and a nation in danger. Nearly 400,000 people fled the refugee camps following recent events, and the situation could still worsen. Humanitarian agencies, already struggling to access the populations in need, are now encountering additional restrictions. In this context, should the international community intensify its efforts to protect these vulnerable populations, even if that implies dialogue with controversial actors?
### Towards a collective response
The situation in Sudan requires a multidimensional approach, involving national, regional and international actors. An inclusive dialogue seems to be a way to explore, even if it is strewn with pitfalls. Local actors must also be integrated into any discussion to find a lasting solution. Returning to the negotiation table could represent a glimmer of hope in this dark landscape, making it possible to open ways to peace while seeking to establish responsibility for past violations.
### Conclusion
Dagalo’s Declaration on the establishment of a government of peace and unity, while marked by the need for legitimacy, comes up against a context of violence and human rights abuses. The current situation in Sudan is an urgent appeal for action, not only to restore peace but also to protect the most vulnerable populations. It remains to be hoped that constructive solutions will emerge from this crisis, nourishing the hope of real reconciliation within a country that has been suffering for too long.