** The parliamentary offensive in Hungary: a debate on gender identities and the rights of children **
Hungary is going through a period of political and societal tension, especially around gender issues and rights of LGBT+people. The Hungarian parliament recently mentioned the idea of engraving in the constitution the existence of only two genres, male and female, while affirming the primacy of children’s law on other considerations. This approach arouses various reactions both at national and international level, raising questions about individual freedom and human rights.
### A historical and socio -political context
Hungary has undergone significant changes since the fall of communism in 1989. Although advanced individual rights have taken place, especially for LGBT+people, the past few years have seen backwards in certain legislation. The current government, led by Viktor Orbán and his party, Fidesz, inscribes its decisions from a conservative perspective, posing as a defender of traditional family values.
This desire to restrict the recognition of gender identities appears in a broader context where populist movements around the world question the social skills of certain minorities. For Matthieu Boisdron, doctor of contemporary history at Sorbonne University, “the Hungarian situation must be observed in the prism of a broader ideological bubbling in Europe, where the defense of LGBT+ rights comes up against increasing resistances. »»
### The implications of the proposed legislation
Graving in the constitution the existence of two genres could have several consequences. First of all, this could limit the rights of people who do not identify themselves in this binary. Thus, non -binary, transgender or gender fluid individuals could find themselves without adequate legal protection. From a societal point of view, this decision could help stigmatize already marginalized identities.
In addition, the notion of “primacy of children’s law” may seem protective at first glance, but it raises questions about the interpretation that will be made of it. The educational choices and the rights of parents could be undermined if the idea is diverted to attribute to children the inability to understand or claim their identity before a certain age.
### Reactions in civil society
The reactions to these proposals are divided. On the one hand, human rights groups and LGBT+ organizations show their concern, arguing that these measures could strengthen discrimination and harm the mental health of those concerned. On the other hand, segments of the Hungarian population, supported by the government, see these initiatives as a means of maintaining traditional standards and protecting family values.
The central question remains: how to find a balance between the protection of the rights of individuals and respect for cultural and traditional convictions? The voice of civil society, experts and families, is crucial in this collective reflection.
## Research and constructive reflections
To advance in this sensitive debate, it would be wise to promote an open dialogue including all stakeholders. The establishment of discussion forums where citizens, teachers, parents and representatives of LGBT+ communities could exchange their perspectives could help to appease tensions.
In addition, an educational approach on gender and identity issues, from an early age, would help to train more tolerant and well -informed generations. It is possible to study the practices of other European countries that have integrated these questions into their education systems, with positive results.
### Conclusion
Developments in Hungary offer an overview of contemporary challenges related to gender issues and the rights of individuals. It is with particular attention that we must consider the consequences of these attempts to constitutional modify. The key lies in our ability to open a respectful and inclusive discussion space which not only makes it possible to think about the rights of LGBT+ people but also to explore solutions that meet the concerns of all citizens. A constructive and empathetic approach can, hopefully, initiate a beneficial change for the whole of Hungarian society.