### The fight against hatred speeches: an ethical imperative for the Cameroonian media
In Cameroon, a powerful teaching is illustrated through the recent gallery signed by fifteen media owners, denouncing the proliferation of hatred speeches in the media landscape and on social networks. This approach, although rare, is not only a cry of alarm in the face of an alarming situation, but it also testifies to an urgent need to redefine the standards of responsibility within the media sphere.
#### A boiling context
As the next presidential election approaches, political and social polarization is palpable. Historical tensions between different communities, exacerbated by socio-economic factors, tend to feed a “culture of hatred”. Tribal speeches and identity cleavages seem to replace real discussions focused on substantive subjects, such as public policies, economic development or social justice. In a country where national cohesion is particularly volatile, the impact of these speeches can be devastating.
François Bambou, one of the spokespersons for this initiative, evokes a progressive erosion of the quality of the public debate. The media, traditionally considered as pillars of democracy, sometimes seem to be transformed into amplifiers of the division. This raises essential questions about the responsibility of journalists, but also on the passive complicity of certain political actors. Such a situation inevitably calls for an in -depth analysis.
#### A fight for journalistic ethics
Unlike a reductive vision that could assimilate the denunciation of hate speech to an attempt to muzzle freedom of expression, it is crucial to understand that it is a call to responsibility. The media must play a founding role as regulators of the democratic debate. It is only through a rigorous ethics that journalists can guarantee that their work does not contribute to the fragmentation of society.
Studies have shown that the proliferation of extreme discourse and hatred has been correlated with an increase in social conflicts. Universities and think tanks from around the world, calibrated on group and communication dynamics data, emphasize that degrading discourses fuel not only rivalries but can also catalyze acts of violence. Cameroon, with its history marked by such tensions, must especially learn from international examples where communications control has made it possible to calm ardor before they cause tragedies.
#### A call to the State and to civil society
The lack of reaction from the public authorities to this drift is alarming. The laws supposed to regulate incentive to hatred exist, but their application leaves something to be desired. The state must not only assume its role as a regulator, but also cooperate with the media to create an environment conducive to respectful exchanges.
A series of initiatives could be envisaged, ranging from the organization of discussion forums between journalists and authorities, to the implementation of training programs on ethics and journalistic ethics. Likewise, public awareness of the dangers of hate speeches could strengthen the social fabric by bringing citizens to question the validity of the information they consume.
#### Civil society: Act now
Finally, civil society must also play its role. Popular initiatives such as awareness campaigns and peaceful demonstrations, in favor of a constructive and respectful dialogue, can make a real difference. The role of the Cameroonian diaspora abroad, as an ambassador of peace and respect values, must be recognized and encouraged.
In conclusion, the gallery signed by the media owners in Cameroon is not only a denunciation, but also a call to a renewal of the social pact. The fight against hate speeches is not only the affair of the media or the state, but a collective effort towards a more united society. Each actor has a role to play in this dynamic, and it is our responsibility, as citizens, to promote a public discourse where respect and argument prevail over hatred and rejection.