** The European Union in front of the storm in the DRC: geopolitical issues and lasting implications **
On February 24, 2025, the Council of the European Union will look at a crisis situation which continues to worsen: the conflict in the east of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Faced with the existence of a complex mixture of national interests, ethnic rivalries and regional influences, Reunion promises to be crucial, not only for the DRC but also for the whole of security and stability in Central Africa.
### A complex historical and geopolitical context
The DRC has a history marked by armed conflicts which go back to colonization and which have been exacerbated by external interference, especially those of Rwanda. The M23 terrorist group, supported by Kigali, continues to destabilize the region. A key element to take into account is the richness of natural resources of the DRC, in particular strategic ores such as the pass, copper and gold. These resources attract not only national interests, but also multinational companies that take advantage of conflicts to exploit these low -cost resources.
The report of the United Nations Group of Experts on the DRC highlighted that illegal activities linked to the exploitation of minerals have played a central role in the financing of armed groups, including the M23. This economic dynamic underlines an little known reality: the conflict in the DRC is not only a struggle for power, but also a confrontation for the control of a real geological treasure.
### Reactions of the European Union: Pressures and resolutions
The recent vote of the European Parliament, which condemned the military actions of Rwanda, is an attempt to change the current dynamics. With 443 votes for out of 495 voters, this European momentum could pave the way for more concrete measures. However, the real challenge lies in the implementation. Thierry Mariani’s statements underline an ambiguity within European institutions: the need to pass words to acts is essential, but not without obstacles.
The role of ambassador Christian Ndongala Nkunku underlines the importance of diplomatic actions. By focusing on “high -level direct contacts”, it evokes a proactive approach to diplomacy which could, if it is supported by concrete decisions, strengthen the position of the DRC on the international level.
## economic issues: beyond humanitarian aid
Opposition to humanitarian aid can be considered an appropriate response, but another aspect should be looked at: arms trade and financial flows. The future of financial support in Rwanda, proposed by the European Parliament, could have major implications for peace in the region. By highlighting opaque financial practices, the EU could act in favor of increased transparency which would prevent the bypass of sanctions.
European companies have a role to play in this dynamic. The implementation of social and environmental responsibility policies could help reduce indirect conflict funding, ensuring that supply chains are not associated with armed groups.
### Conclusion: a collective action imperative
The meeting of the Council of the European Union is part of a context that goes far beyond simple diplomatic considerations. More than a simple debate on the DRC, this meeting could be a turning point for the EU. By resuming its role of leader in the field of human rights and world security, the EU could not only exert pressure on Rwanda, but also to advance a vision of peace based on economic and social justice .
In short, the gaze of Europe on the DRC is not only a question of military interventions or resolutions, but requires a full review of the way in which the resources are managed and actors involved. A carefully orchestrated collective action could potentially transform the future of the DRC, and thereby, the future of Central Africa, while reaffirming European Union’s commitment to values that transcend borders. This is the real challenge that the EU will face in the months and years to come.