Why is the curfew in Lubumbashi insufficient in the face of increasing insecurity?

### Lubumbashi: Curfew and Insecurity – A Sufficient Response?

Lubumbashi, the second largest city in the DRC, is plagued by growing insecurity, prompting Governor Jacques Kyabula to impose a curfew from midnight to 5 a.m., starting January 20. This decision follows an alarming increase in crime, with the rate having climbed by 27% in the last quarter of 2023. While this measure aims to restore security, it risks impacting individual freedoms and the nightlife of a population already in economic difficulty.

Alternatives, such as increased police presence or social integration programs, are emerging as potential avenues to combat crime in the long term. The key lies in a comprehensive approach that considers the structural roots of the problem, including unemployment and lack of opportunities for young people. While the curfew represents an immediate response, a deeper reflection on the social needs of citizens is essential to building sustainable security in Lubumbashi.
### Lubumbashi: A Curfew in the Face of Growing Insecurity – What Prospects for the Population and the Authorities?

Lubumbashi, the second most populous city in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), is today at the center of attention, due to the alarming rise in insecurity. The Governor of Haut-Katanga, Jacques Kyabula, recently announced the establishment of a curfew, the provisions of which will come into effect on Monday, January 20. This curfew will be from midnight to 5 a.m., in the hope of restoring security in a city already tested by multidimensional socio-economic problems.

### A Response to an Alarming Situation

The establishment of this measure is not without context. Crime in Lubumbashi has increased considerably in recent months, manifesting itself in armed robberies, assaults and public order disturbances. According to local police statistics, the crime rate increased by 27% during the last quarter of 2023, which has raised concerns among citizens and authorities. Jacques Kyabula made this announcement during a march in support of the armed forces and the Wazalendo, the Congolese fighters on the front lines, suggesting that the fight against insecurity is also a collective effort, involving the population.

### A Balanced Strategy

The curfew can be seen as a measure of last resort aimed at restoring peace, but it also raises a number of questions. One of the recurring sticking points in the debate on the curfew is its impact on individual freedoms and human rights. Economists and sociologists question the effectiveness of this measure, which can be felt as a collective sanction. In Lubumbashi, many night workers, driven by economic necessity, must juggle their survival with the new restrictions imposed.

### A Reflection on Alternatives

While curfews are a legitimate response to a crisis of insecurity, it may be interesting to analyze other options that local authorities could consider. Looking at international examples, some cities such as Bogotá in Colombia have managed to reduce crime by increasing police presence in at-risk areas, while integrating long-term prevention programs that engage the community. In Lubumbashi, initiatives focused on education, crime awareness, and the socio-professional integration of young people could also play a crucial role in combating insecurity in the long term.

### Social and Economic Challenges

At a deeper level, insecurity in Lubumbashi must be stripped of its appearance of horizontality, to better appreciate the structural roots of this rise in crime. High unemployment rates, combined with inadequate social services and endemic corruption, create a breeding ground for despair and crime. Young people, often without opportunities, become easy prey for criminal networks. An introspection on youth care and a substantial investment in education and vocational training programs seem to be an economic and social imperative.

### Conclusion

The situation in Lubumbashi is worrying and the response of the authorities, although realistic, must be considered in a broader framework. The establishment of a curfew could be a first step towards a return to tranquility, but it is essential that decision-makers also take into account the socio-economic dimensions that fuel this insecurity. At the same time, it is imperative to listen to the voices of citizens: their experiences on the ground must inform future strategies in order to build a city where security and prosperity coexist. The adoption of an inclusive and responsible governance model will then appear as a necessity, not only to restore security, but also to avoid the increase in inequalities and discontent. Fatshimetrie has the responsibility to inform and guide readers through these crucial issues, because the quest for social peace remains the ultimate goal of any society.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *