The state of siege in North Kivu and Ituri: a mixed picture
The Round Table on the state of siege in North Kivu and Ituri has recently come to an end, sparking an intense debate as to the follow-up to be given to this exceptional measure. While some advocate the lifting of the state of siege, others highlight the positive results it has brought in the fight against insecurity. Let’s take a closer look at the situation in these two provinces of the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
In Ituri, the state of siege has strengthened control of the military administration and considerably reduced insecurity. The local negative forces have mainly engaged in the Disarmament, Demobilization, Social and Community Reintegration Program (P-DDRSC), and economic activities have resumed. The province is gradually regaining a long-awaited stability, where armed groups are less and less present.
However, the situation is more complex in North Kivu. Despite the efforts deployed within the framework of the state of siege, insecurity persists, particularly with the rebel groups ADF and M23. The state of siege has, however, shed light on the connections of these groups with international actors, notably Rwanda. Internal complicity in this precarious security situation has also been highlighted, leading to the arrests of senior political and military officials.
Faced with this mixed assessment, the question of the lifting of the state of siege arises. While some fear that this will plunge the region back into instability, others believe that a requalification of this measure could make it possible to correct the weaknesses and consolidate the progress already made.
It is important to stress that the final decision will be taken during the “plenary” of the Round Table on the state of siege. In the meantime, it is crucial to take into account the opinions of the population, who above all hope to find peace and security in these regions long torn apart by conflict.
It is crucial that the national authorities continue to implement effective security and development strategies to guarantee the long-term stability of these provinces. The fight against insecurity and armed groups must be accompanied by concrete actions aimed at strengthening institutions and promoting economic and social development.
In conclusion, the state of siege in North Kivu and Ituri has presented mixed results, with significant progress in Ituri but persistent challenges in North Kivu. The decision to maintain, lift or requalify this measure must be taken with care, taking into account the expectations and needs of local populations