The trial of the Democratic Republic of Congo against Rwanda before the East African Court of Justice opened last Thursday, generating major interest within the African diplomatic community. From the outset of the hearings, Rwanda attempted to delay the process by invoking procedural objections, thereby seeking to evade examination of the serious charges brought against it.
Rwanda’s delaying tactics were multiple and varied. First, the country challenged the jurisdiction of the Court to judge the facts alleged against it. In addition, it raised the argument of temporality, claiming that some facts dated back to a period prior to the DRC’s accession to the East African Community. Finally, concerns were expressed regarding the mandate of the DRC’s lawyers and the translation of the documents presented, even demanding the certification of the translations.
However, on the prosecution side, the DRC presented solid and substantiated accusations. She particularly pointed the finger at Rwanda for its alleged role in maintaining insecurity in the eastern part of Congo for nearly 25 years. The neighboring country is said to have fueled and supported various rebel movements, such as the RCD, the CNDP, and the M23, with the aim of destabilizing the region and seizing natural resources. United Nations reports also support these allegations.
Faced with these accusations, the DRC’s lawyers remained firm and determined to continue on the path of examining the merits of the case, refusing to give in to Rwanda’s delaying tactics. The judge of the East African Court of Justice decided to examine the prerequisites raised by the Rwandan party, suggesting intense and complex hearings.
This trial raises major issues in terms of international justice and relations between countries in the region. The outcome of this case will certainly have significant repercussions on the political and diplomatic climate in East Africa, and highlights the need to find lasting solutions to ensure peace and stability in the region.