Title: The case of the unjustly detained detainee: a case that raises questions about abuse of power
Introduction :
In a case that sparked strong reactions, a 36-year-old lawyer found himself detained while trying to secure the release of his client, a carpenter accused of an alleged breach of contract. This case highlights alleged abuses of power within law enforcement and raises questions about the common practice of detention for civil litigation.
The context of the case:
The carpenter’s client reportedly had issues with a customer over custom-made chairs. The client allegedly rejected the chairs, claiming they did not match the designs provided, leading to a complaint being filed and the carpenter’s subsequent detention.
The lawyer’s actions:
The lawyer, Mr. Sonupe, attempted to settle the matter amicably by pleading with the investigating officer, Supol Grace. He stressed that this matter was a civil dispute and was not criminal. Unfortunately, despite their efforts at negotiation, the police insisted on continuing the detention of the carpenter and demanded a sum of N30,000 for his release on bail.
The confusion and complications:
While in detention, Mr. Sonupe faced further complications. When he asked to see his client in his cell, the investigating officer indicated that she would bring an electronic payment terminal for payment of the N30,000. However, confusion arose when another officer accused Mr. Sonupe of being alone with a detained suspect without adequate supervision.
The incident with the DPO:
Mr. Sonupe’s brother was informed of the situation and when he arrived with their aunt to request the lawyer’s release, the police claimed that Mr. Sonupe had tried to disarm an officer. Mr. Sonupe quickly clarified the situation, stating that it was actually the DPO (Director of Police Operations) who had tried to hit him.
Difficulties in finding a guarantor:
Despite Mr. Sonupe’s attempts to resolve the matter, he was jailed again and the police requested that a surety be present. However, when his brother and aunt volunteered, the DPO rejected them, demanding a male civilian official. Mr. Sonupe’s aunt, claiming to be a civil servant, was also rejected and they had to wait for hours until an acceptable person arrived, around 10 p.m.
Conclusion :
Case of wrongfully detained detainee highlights alleged abuse of power within law enforcement and raises questions about common practice of detention for civil disputes. It is essential that such cases are investigated thoroughly and that steps are taken to prevent such abuses in the future. Respecting the fundamental rights of individuals is a top priority and those responsible must be held accountable for their actions.