Donald Trump is a controversial figure who continues to be talked about even after his term as President of the United States. His recent legal battle over his presidential immunity is a striking example of his continued involvement in political news.
The United States Supreme Court recently refused to rule urgently on the question of Donald Trump’s immunity when he was president. The ruling was seen as a victory for Trump, who is surrounded by several criminal cases and hopes to delay his trial.
Trump’s lawyers argued that the former president had “absolute immunity” for his actions while serving in the White House. However, Judge Tanya Chutkan, who will preside over his trial, rejected the claim, saying no text protects a former president from criminal prosecution.
The Supreme Court’s decision not to immediately intervene in this case has therefore prolonged the legal process, which could potentially delay the start of Trump’s trial. This becomes a crucial issue for him, because the Republican primaries for the 2024 presidential election begin in January, and he wants to avoid his trial coinciding with this period.
This legal battle also raises the question of whether a former president has immunity from criminal prosecution. The case law on this subject is unclear, especially since Trump is the first former American president to be criminally charged. The Supreme Court, dominated by conservative justices following Trump’s appointments, is expected to decide that question, as well as other cases involving the former president.
This year therefore promises to be eventful for Donald Trump, with several hearings before the Supreme Court and the prospect of a trial which could prevent him from running for president again. Despite these legal challenges, Trump continues to mobilize his supporters and generate excitement around his potential 2024 candidacy.
In conclusion, Donald Trump’s presidential immunity is a hot topic that sparks legal and political debates in the United States. The decision of the Supreme Court not to rule urgently on this question prolongs the suspense regarding the progress of the trial of the former president.