** Analysis of the reaction of the dynamics of the women of the great Kasai in the face of the words of an influencer in Kinshasa **
On May 28, 2025, a significant event occurred in Kinshasa, where the dynamics of the women of the Grand Kasai (DFGK) issued a press release in response to the remarks deemed derogatory of a local influencer, Denise Kanjinga Mukendi Dusauchoy. This incident highlights the tensions that may exist within Congolese society, in particular concerning the question of cultural values, freedom of expression, and the role of women in public discourse.
** Context and reactions **
The call for public excuse launched by Christine Malengu, a member of the DFGK, seems to be motivated by a desire to protect the image and the values that the community of Grand Kasai represents. In a country where social cohesion is still fragile and where political and economic challenges remain pressing, these women choose to align themselves with support for the President of the Republic, Félix-Antoine Tshisekedi, evoking the need for coherent solidarity in the face of the challenges that the country is confronted.
This dynamic of defense of traditional values and harmonization of public discourse raises several questions. What is the role of an influencer in contemporary Congolese society? This question is amplified by the scope of social networks, which offer individuals the ability to share their opinions, but also to cause controversies. Are Denise Kanjinga’s interventions, who criticize public figures, are a brand of freedom of expression or are they an attack on social harmony?
** Cultural values in play **
DFGK’s statements recall a socio -cultural reality where the reputation and group image can take precedence over individual freedoms. As members of the Grand Kasai community, women have chosen to take a stand to preserve, in their eyes, the values that define their identity. However, can such an approach really promote dialogue and progress, or does it contribute to a climate of censorship and fear?
The customary chief Fwamba, by supporting the call for the restraint of the influencer, illustrates this double dynamic: on the one hand, the defense of cultural norms, and on the other, the importance of unity in favor of a leader in difficulty. This raises the question of whether criticizing public figures is compatible with constructive support for the nation.
** Freedom of expression and social responsibility **
This situation joins broader debates on freedom of expression in the DRC. In an environment where individual voices can be stifled by the fear of repression or social rejection, how to encourage an open and inclusive discourse? Is it possible to balance the constructive criticism of leaders with respect for cultural values without falling into the trap of social pressure?
In addition, the impact of the influence of social networks should not be underestimated. With their potential scope, influencers occupy a unique position in modern society, at the crossroads between individual emancipation and collective responsibility. So how can these public figures navigate between their desire to express themselves freely and the need to respect the standards that govern their community?
** Towards a constructive dialogue **
It is undeniable that the women of the DFGK are in a difficult position, seeking to balance their will to defend their culture while recognizing the reality of individual expression. To move forward, it would be wise to promote an open dialogue where criticism can be heard without being immediately perceived as a threat.
A framework for debate can thus be envisaged, making it possible to discuss cultural values while improving understanding of contemporary challenges. This could go through meeting spaces for influencers and community leaders, in order to explore together how to combine freedom of expression and respect for traditions.
In conclusion, the event around Denise Kanjinga and the DFGK underlines complex dynamics within the current Congolese company. With a shared desire to erect bridges rather than walls, it becomes essential to welcome the diversity of voices and to build together a community which values both constructive criticism and respect for cultural values. Such an approach could enrich the socio -cultural landscape in the DRC and promote fruitful dialogue for the future.